# Distortion in metric matching with ordinal preferences

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12119 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12119/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Breaking the Metric Voting Distortion Barrier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17838/) (2023)
- [Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10369/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Suppose that we have n agents and n items which lie in a shared metric space. We would like to match the agents to items such that the total distance from agents to their matched items is as small as possible. However, instead of having direct access to distances in the metric, we only have each agent's ranking of the items in order of distance. Given this limited information, what is the minimum possible worst-case approximation ratio (known as the distortion) that a matching mechanism can guarantee? Previous work by Caragiannis et al. proved that the (deterministic) Serial Dictatorship mechanism has distortion at most 2n - 1. We improve this by providing a simple deterministic mechanism that has distortion O(n2). We also provide the first nontrivial lower bound on this problem, showing that any matching mechanism (deterministic or randomized) must have worst-case distortion Omega(log n). In addition to these new bounds, we show that a large class of truthful mechanisms derived from Deferred Acceptance all have worst-case distortion at least 2n - 1, and we find an intriguing connection between thin matchings (analogous to the well-known thin trees conjecture) and the distortion gap between deterministic and randomized mechanisms.