# Contextualized Word Vector-based Methods for Discovering Semantic Differences with No Training nor Word Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11516 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11516/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.09096/) (2016)
- [Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14118/) (2020)
- [Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.3315/) (2014)
- [Temporal Analysis of Language through Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.3515/) (2014)
- [Dynamic Word Embeddings for Evolving Semantic Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00607/) (2017)
- [Time-Out: Temporal Referencing for Robust Modeling of Lexical Semantic Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01688/) (2019)
- [Simple, Interpretable and Stable Method for Detecting Words with Usage Change across Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14330/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose methods for discovering semantic differences in words appearing in two corpora based on the norms of contextualized word vectors. The key idea is that the coverage of meanings is reflected in the norm of its mean word vector. The proposed methods do not require the assumptions concerning words and corpora for comparison that the previous methods do. All they require are to compute the mean vector of contextualized word vectors and its norm for each word type. Nevertheless, they are (i) robust for the skew in corpus size; (ii) capable of detecting semantic differences in infrequent words; and (iii) effective in pinpointing word instances that have a meaning missing in one of the two corpora for comparison. We show these advantages for native and non-native English corpora and also for historical corpora.