# Deep Learning Methods for Extracting Metaphorical Names of Flowers and Plants

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10833 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10833/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10676/) (2019)
- [MUDES: Multilingual Detection of Offensive Spans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09665/) (2021)
- [WLV-RIT at SemEval-2021 Task 5: A Neural Transformer Framework for Detecting Toxic Spans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04630/) (2021)
- [BERT(s) to Detect Multiword Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07832/) (2022)
- [DTW at Qur'an QA 2022: Utilising Transfer Learning with Transformers for Question Answering in a Low-resource Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06025/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The domain of Botany is rich with metaphorical terms. Those terms play an important role in the description and identification of flowers and plants. However, the identification of such terms in discourse is an arduous task. This leads in some cases to committing errors during translation processes and lexicographic tasks. The process is even more challenging when it comes to machine translation, both in the cases of single-word terms and multi-word terms. One of the recent concerns of Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications and Machine Translation (MT) technologies is the automatic identification of metaphor-based words in discourse through Deep Learning (DL). In this study, we seek to fill this gap through the use of thirteen popular transformer based models, as well as ChatGPT, and we show that discriminative models perform better than GPT-3.5 model with our best performer reporting 92.2349% F1 score in metaphoric flower and plant names identification task.