# Public Perception of Generative AI on Twitter: An Empirical Study Based on Occupation and Usage

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09537 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09537/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 May 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11409/) (2024)
- [REALM: A Dataset of Real-World LLM Use Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18792/) (2025)
- [GPT in Sheep's Clothing: The Risk of Customized GPTs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09075/) (2024)
- [Expertise elevates AI usage: experimental evidence comparing laypeople and professional artists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12374/) (2025)
- [EmoXpt: Analyzing Emotional Variances in Human Comments and LLM-Generated Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06597/) (2025)
- [AI Rivalry as a Craft: How Resisting and Embracing Generative AI Reshape Writing Professions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09901/) (2025)
- [The Hall of AI Fears and Hopes: Comparing the Views of AI Influencers and those of Members of the U.S. Public Through an Interactive Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06016/) (2025)
- [Visions of Destruction: Exploring a Potential of Generative AI in Interactive Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14644/) (2024)
- [Winning and losing with Artificial Intelligence: What public discourse about ChatGPT tells us about how societies make sense of technological change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06876/) (2025)
- [Mapping Technological Futures: Anticipatory Discourse Through Text Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02853/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models for Career Mobility Analysis: A Study of Gender, Race, and Job Change Using U.S. Online Resume Profiles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12010/) (2025)
- [TopiCLEAR: Adaptive embedding clustering for interpretable topic discovery from short texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06694/) (2025)
- [Strategic Advice in the Age of Personal AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02055/) (2026)
- [Whose Voice Counts? Mapping Stakeholder Perspectives on AI Through Public Submissions to the U.S. Government](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22650/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of generative AI has sparked substantial discussions, with the potential to have profound impacts on society in all aspects. As emerging technologies continue to advance, it is imperative to facilitate their proper integration into society, managing expectations and fear. This paper investigates users' perceptions of generative AI using 3M posts on Twitter from January 2019 to March 2023, especially focusing on their occupation and usage. We find that people across various occupations, not just IT-related ones, show a strong interest in generative AI. The sentiment toward generative AI is generally positive, and remarkably, their sentiments are positively correlated with their exposure to AI. Among occupations, illustrators show exceptionally negative sentiment mainly due to concerns about the unethical usage of artworks in constructing AI. People use ChatGPT in diverse ways, and notably the casual usage in which they "play with" ChatGPT tends to associate with positive sentiments. After the release of ChatGPT, people's interest in AI in general has increased dramatically; however, the topic with the most significant increase and positive sentiment is related to crypto, indicating the hype-worthy characteristics of generative AI. These findings would offer valuable lessons for policymaking on the emergence of new technology and also empirical insights for the considerations of future human-AI symbiosis.