# Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection of Rogue Soil Moisture Sensors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05495 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05495/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03832/) (2015)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01271/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Scalable Representation Learning for Multivariate Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10738/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning for IoT Big Data and Streaming Analytics: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04301/) (2017)
- [Anomaly Detection through Transfer Learning in Agriculture and Manufacturing IoT Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05814/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

IoT data is a central element in the successful digital transformation of agriculture. However, IoT data comes with its own set of challenges. E.g., the risk of data contamination due to rogue sensors. A sensor is considered rogue when it provides incorrect measurements over time. To ensure correct analytical results, an essential preprocessing step when working with IoT data is the detection of such rogue sensors. Existing methods assume that well-behaving sensors are known or that a large majority of the sensors is well-behaving. However, real-world data is often completely unlabeled and voluminous, calling for self-supervised methods that can detect rogue sensors without prior information. We present a self-supervised anomalous sensor detector based on a neural network with a contrastive loss, followed by DBSCAN. A core contribution of our paper is the use of Dynamic Time Warping in the negative sampling for the triplet loss. This novelty makes the use of triplet networks feasible for anomalous sensor detection. Our method shows promising results on a challenging dataset of soil moisture sensors deployed in multiple pear orchards.