# Analyzing Hong Kong's Legal Judgments from a Computational Linguistics point-of-view

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02558 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02558/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07997/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02478/) (2018)
- [Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classification on EU Legislation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02192/) (2019)
- [Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09168/) (2017)
- [Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10474/) (2022)
- [Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08504/) (2018)
- [Plain English Summarization of Contracts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00424/) (2019)
- [CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09156/) (2019)
- [Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14083/) (2020)
- [Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06537/) (2018)
- [Keyword Assisted Topic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05964/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [HKJudge: A Legal Discourse-Annotated Corpus for Interpreting What Courts Find, How They Reason, and What They Rule](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06679/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Analysis and extraction of useful information from legal judgments using computational linguistics was one of the earliest problems posed in the domain of information retrieval. Presently, several commercial vendors exist who automate such tasks. However, a crucial bottleneck arises in the form of exorbitant pricing and lack of resources available in analysis of judgements mete out by Hong Kong's Legal System. This paper attempts to bridge this gap by providing several statistical, machine learning, deep learning and zero-shot learning based methods to effectively analyze legal judgments from Hong Kong's Court System. The methods proposed consists of: (1) Citation Network Graph Generation, (2) PageRank Algorithm, (3) Keyword Analysis and Summarization, (4) Sentiment Polarity, and (5) Paragrah Classification, in order to be able to extract key insights from individual as well a group of judgments together. This would make the overall analysis of judgments in Hong Kong less tedious and more automated in order to extract insights quickly using fast inferencing. We also provide an analysis of our results by benchmarking our results using Large Language Models making robust use of the HuggingFace ecosystem.