# Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10145 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10145/

## Key facts

- Cited by 89 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15056/) (2023)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05322/) (2021)
- [SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00741/) (2019)
- [Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Help](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13487/) (2021)
- [Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07736/) (2023)
- [TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00036/) (2020)
- [An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08653/) (2023)
- [A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11717/) (2023)
- [How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14548/) (2022)
- [Thou shalt not hate: Countering Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.04409/) (2018)
- [Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12767/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT: Beginning of an End of Manual Linguistic Data Annotation? Use Case of Automatic Genre Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03953/) (2023)
- [Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12423/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Large-scale Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03911/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Machine Learning for Networking: Techniques, Applications and Research Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06599/) (2017)
- [Seeing ChatGPT Through Students' Eyes: An Analysis of TikTok Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05349/) (2023)
- [Twitter Dataset for 2022 Russo-Ukrainian Crisis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02955/) (2022)
- [A Reddit Dataset for the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict in 2022](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05107/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 89)

- ["Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03825/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13707/) (2023)
- [Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08493/) (2023)
- [The Butterfly Effect of Altering Prompts: How Small Changes and Jailbreaks Affect Large Language Model Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03729/) (2024)
- [Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00176/) (2023)
- [ClusterLLM: Large Language Models as a Guide for Text Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14871/) (2023)
- [Let the LLMs Talk: Simulating Human-to-Human Conversational QA via Zero-Shot LLM-to-LLM Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02913/) (2023)
- [LLM-Assisted Content Analysis: Using Large Language Models to Support Deductive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14924/) (2023)
- [Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12860/) (2023)
- [MEGAnno+: A Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18050/) (2024)
- [SMILE: Single-turn to Multi-turn Inclusive Language Expansion via ChatGPT for Mental Health Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00450/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12947/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Data Synthesis and Augmentation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12896/) (2024)
- [Neither Valid nor Reliable? Investigating the Use of LLMs as Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18076/) (2025)
- [If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16795/) (2024)
- [The Parrot Dilemma: Human-Labeled vs. LLM-augmented Data in Classification Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13861/) (2023)
- [Can GPT-4 Support Analysis of Textual Data in Tasks Requiring Highly Specialized Domain Expertise?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13906/) (2023)
- [The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01299/) (2024)
- [AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11073/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17633/) (2024)
- [A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09760/) (2024)
- [CodeMirage: Hallucinations in Code Generated by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08333/) (2024)
- [MedHalu: Hallucinations in Responses to Healthcare Queries by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19492/) (2024)
- [Automated Claim Matching with Large Language Models: Empowering Fact-Checkers in the Fight Against Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09223/) (2023)
- [SeqGPT: An Out-of-the-box Large Language Model for Open Domain Sequence Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10529/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17368/) (2024)
- [On the Brittle Foundations of ReAct Prompting for Agentic Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13966/) (2024)
- [Keeping Humans in the Loop: Human-Centered Automated Annotation with Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09467/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The release of ChatGPT has uncovered a range of possibilities whereby large language models (LLMs) can substitute human intelligence. In this paper, we seek to understand whether ChatGPT has the potential to reproduce human-generated label annotations in social computing tasks. Such an achievement could significantly reduce the cost and complexity of social computing research. As such, we use ChatGPT to relabel five seminal datasets covering stance detection (2x), sentiment analysis, hate speech, and bot detection. Our results highlight that ChatGPT does have the potential to handle these data annotation tasks, although a number of challenges remain. ChatGPT obtains an average accuracy 0.609. Performance is highest for the sentiment analysis dataset, with ChatGPT correctly annotating 64.9% of tweets. Yet, we show that performance varies substantially across individual labels. We believe this work can open up new lines of analysis and act as a basis for future research into the exploitation of ChatGPT for human annotation tasks.