# A Study of Biologically Plausible Neural Network: The Role and Interactions of Brain-Inspired Mechanisms in Continual Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06738 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06738/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Learning without Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.09282/) (2016)
- [Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08840/) (2017)
- [Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00420/) (2018)
- [Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.10112/) (2018)
- [Continual Learning of Context-dependent Processing in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01256/) (2018)
- [Towards Robust Evaluations of Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09733/) (2018)
- [Learning Fast, Learning Slow: A General Continual Learning Method based on Complementary Learning System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12604/) (2022)
- [Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04132/) (2021)
- [How Can We Be So Dense? The Benefits of Using Highly Sparse Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11257/) (2019)
- [Selfless Sequential Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05421/) (2018)
- [Biologically-plausible learning algorithms can scale to large datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03567/) (2018)
- [Avoiding Catastrophe: Active Dendrites Enable Multi-Task Learning in Dynamic Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00042/) (2021)
- [Sparsity and Heterogeneous Dropout for Continual Learning in the Null Space of Neural Activations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06514/) (2022)
- [Two Sparsities Are Better Than One: Unlocking the Performance Benefits of Sparse-Sparse Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13896/) (2021)
- [Modelling continual learning in humans with Hebbian context gating and exponentially decaying task signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11560/) (2022)
- [Training dynamically balanced excitatory-inhibitory networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.11424/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Advancing Investment Frontiers: Industry-grade Deep Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07916/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Humans excel at continually acquiring, consolidating, and retaining information from an ever-changing environment, whereas artificial neural networks (ANNs) exhibit catastrophic forgetting. There are considerable differences in the complexity of synapses, the processing of information, and the learning mechanisms in biological neural networks and their artificial counterparts, which may explain the mismatch in performance. We consider a biologically plausible framework that constitutes separate populations of exclusively excitatory and inhibitory neurons that adhere to Dale's principle, and the excitatory pyramidal neurons are augmented with dendritic-like structures for context-dependent processing of stimuli. We then conduct a comprehensive study on the role and interactions of different mechanisms inspired by the brain, including sparse non-overlapping representations, Hebbian learning, synaptic consolidation, and replay of past activations that accompanied the learning event. Our study suggests that the employing of multiple complementary mechanisms in a biologically plausible architecture, similar to the brain, may be effective in enabling continual learning in ANNs.
