# False Claims against Model Ownership Resolution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06607 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06607/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 54 of its 90 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 54)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7766/) (2014)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Adversarial examples in the physical world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.02533/) (2016)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.09414/) (2018)
- [Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02697/) (2016)
- [Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01046/) (2019)
- [SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.08063/) (2017)
- [Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04508/) (2015)
- [Adversarial Training for Free!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12843/) (2019)
- [Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02943/) (2016)
- [Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06978/) (2018)
- [One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08864/) (2017)
- [Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.02770/) (2016)
- [Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07277/) (2016)
- [Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04633/) (2018)
- [Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02766/) (2018)
- [Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.04082/) (2017)
- [High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01838/) (2019)
- [PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.02628/) (2018)
- [Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.04326/) (2016)
- [Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12200/) (2020)
- [Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12366/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Frontier Stitching for Remote Neural Network Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.01894/) (2017)
- [Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10706/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04825/) (2024)
- [GrOVe: Ownership Verification of Graph Neural Networks using Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08566/) (2023)
- [FIT-Print: Towards False-claim-resistant Model Ownership Verification via Targeted Fingerprint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15509/) (2025)
- [DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05622/) (2025)
- [MergePrint: Merge-Resistant Fingerprints for Robust Black-box Ownership Verification of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08604/) (2024)
- [ImF: Implicit Fingerprint for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21805/) (2025)
- [SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Risks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04542/) (2023)
- [GENIE: Watermarking Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04805/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Black-Box Model Ownership Verification through Information Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06130/) (2024)
- [Watermarking Graph Neural Networks via Explanations for Ownership Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05614/) (2025)
- [FLARE: Fingerprinting Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents using Universal Adversarial Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14751/) (2023)
- [From Construction to Injection: Edit-Based Fingerprints for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03122/) (2025)
- [SELF: A Robust Singular Value and Eigenvalue Approach for LLM Fingerprinting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.03620/) (2025)
- [SIF: Semantically In-Distribution Fingerprints for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17041/) (2026)
- [WGLE:Backdoor-free and Multi-bit Black-box Watermarking for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08602/) (2025)
- [Attesting Model Lineage by Consisted Knowledge Evolution with Fine-Tuning Trajectory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11683/) (2026)
- [MeMark: Membrane-Space Watermarking for Spiking Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25738/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural network (DNN) models are valuable intellectual property of model owners, constituting a competitive advantage. Therefore, it is crucial to develop techniques to protect against model theft. Model ownership resolution (MOR) is a class of techniques that can deter model theft. A MOR scheme enables an accuser to assert an ownership claim for a suspect model by presenting evidence, such as a watermark or fingerprint, to show that the suspect model was stolen or derived from a source model owned by the accuser. Most of the existing MOR schemes prioritize robustness against malicious suspects, ensuring that the accuser will win if the suspect model is indeed a stolen model. In this paper, we show that common MOR schemes in the literature are vulnerable to a different, equally important but insufficiently explored, robustness concern: a malicious accuser. We show how malicious accusers can successfully make false claims against independent suspect models that were not stolen. Our core idea is that a malicious accuser can deviate (without detection) from the specified MOR process by finding (transferable) adversarial examples that successfully serve as evidence against independent suspect models. To this end, we first generalize the procedures of common MOR schemes and show that, under this generalization, defending against false claims is as challenging as preventing (transferable) adversarial examples. Via systematic empirical evaluation, we show that our false claim attacks always succeed in the MOR schemes that follow our generalization, including in a real-world model: Amazon's Rekognition API.