# ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06588 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06588/

## Key facts

- Cited by 100 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15056/) (2023)
- [Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06899/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 100)

- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04076/) (2023)
- [Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10621/) (2023)
- [Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07899/) (2023)
- [LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01383/) (2024)
- [Jais and Jais-chat: Arabic-Centric Foundation and Instruction-Tuned Open Generative Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16149/) (2023)
- [Simulating Social Media Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Alternative News Feed Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05984/) (2023)
- [LLM-Assisted Content Analysis: Using Large Language Models to Support Deductive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14924/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12947/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT Evaluation on Sentence Level Relations: A Focus on Temporal, Causal, and Discourse Relations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14827/) (2023)
- [Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04746/) (2023)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01284/) (2023)
- [Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05129/) (2024)
- [Can GPT-4 Support Analysis of Textual Data in Tasks Requiring Highly Specialized Domain Expertise?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13906/) (2023)
- [LLMs as Workers in Human-Computational Algorithms? Replicating Crowdsourcing Pipelines with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10168/) (2023)
- [EEG-GPT: Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models for EEG Classification and Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.18006/) (2024)
- [Cofca: A Step-Wise Counterfactual Multi-hop QA benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11924/) (2024)
- [A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09760/) (2024)
- [Using Large Language Models for Qualitative Analysis can Introduce Serious Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17147/) (2023)
- [Stance Detection: A Practical Guide to Classifying Political Beliefs in Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01723/) (2023)
- [Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01386/) (2024)
- [Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18889/) (2024)
- [Navigating Prompt Complexity for Zero-Shot Classification: A Study of Large Language Models in Computational Social Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14310/) (2023)
- [Automated Claim Matching with Large Language Models: Empowering Fact-Checkers in the Fight Against Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09223/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models as Financial Data Annotators: A Study on Effectiveness and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18152/) (2024)
- [Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18440/) (2023)
- [Keeping Humans in the Loop: Human-Centered Automated Annotation with Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09467/) (2024)
- [Does ChatGPT have Theory of Mind?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14020/) (2023)
- [Just ASR + LLM? A Study on Speech Large Language Models' Ability to Identify and Understand Speaker in Spoken Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04927/) (2024)
- [LyricWhiz: Robust Multilingual Zero-shot Lyrics Transcription by Whispering to ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17103/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper assesses the accuracy, reliability and bias of the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT-4 on the text analysis task of classifying the political affiliation of a Twitter poster based on the content of a tweet. The LLM is compared to manual annotation by both expert classifiers and crowd workers, generally considered the gold standard for such tasks. We use Twitter messages from United States politicians during the 2020 election, providing a ground truth against which to measure accuracy. The paper finds that ChatGPT-4 has achieves higher accuracy, higher reliability, and equal or lower bias than the human classifiers. The LLM is able to correctly annotate messages that require reasoning on the basis of contextual knowledge, and inferences around the author's intentions - traditionally seen as uniquely human abilities. These findings suggest that LLM will have substantial impact on the use of textual data in the social sciences, by enabling interpretive research at a scale.