# Philosophical Foundations of GeoAI: Exploring Sustainability, Diversity, and Bias in GeoAI and Spatial Data Science

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06508 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06508/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Green AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10597/) (2019)
- [Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00364/) (2021)
- [No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08536/) (2017)
- [The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03425/) (2019)
- [Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02839/) (2020)
- [A Review of Location Encoding for GeoAI: Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04006/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17136/) (2025)
- [GIScience in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Research Agenda Towards Autonomous GIS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23633/) (2025)
- [Building Privacy-Preserving and Secure Geospatial Artificial Intelligence Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17319/) (2023)
- [AGI: Artificial General Intelligence for Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12479/) (2023)
- [Whose Truth? Pluralistic Geo-Alignment for (Agentic) AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05432/) (2025)
- [ChatGPT as a mapping assistant: A novel method to enrich maps with generative AI and content derived from street-level photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03204/) (2023)
- [Challenges in data-based geospatial modeling for environmental research and practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11057/) (2023)
- [A comprehensive GeoAI review: Progress, Challenges and Outlooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11643/) (2024)
- [Using LLMs for Analyzing AIS Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07557/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Regional Defaults from Photorealistic Forests in Text-to-Image Generation with DALL-E 2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17255/) (2024)
- [Toward Governance-Aware Autonomous GIS: A Narrative Review of Ethical and Privacy Risks in LLM-Enabled GeoAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16232/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This chapter presents some of the fundamental assumptions and principles that could form the philosophical foundation of GeoAI and spatial data science. Instead of reviewing the well-established characteristics of spatial data (analysis), including interaction, neighborhoods, and autocorrelation, the chapter highlights themes such as sustainability, bias in training data, diversity in schema knowledge, and the (potential lack of) neutrality of GeoAI systems from a unifying ethical perspective. Reflecting on our profession's ethical implications will assist us in conducting potentially disruptive research more responsibly, identifying pitfalls in designing, training, and deploying GeoAI-based systems, and developing a shared understanding of the benefits but also potential dangers of artificial intelligence and machine learning research across academic fields, all while sharing our unique (geo)spatial perspective with others.
