# Assessing Perceived Fairness from Machine Learning Developer's Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03745 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03745/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01943/) (2018)
- [Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04966/) (2019)
- [Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04562/) (2019)
- [Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04783/) (2019)
- [Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09604/) (2020)
- [Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09548/) (2018)
- [Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06922/) (2022)
- [LiFT: A Scalable Framework for Measuring Fairness in ML Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.07433/) (2020)
- [Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13755/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in machine learning (ML) applications is an important practice for developers in research and industry. In ML applications, unfairness is triggered due to bias in the data, curation process, erroneous assumptions, and implicit bias rendered within the algorithmic development process. As ML applications come into broader use developing fair ML applications is critical. Literature suggests multiple views on how fairness in ML is described from the users perspective and students as future developers. In particular, ML developers have not been the focus of research relating to perceived fairness. This paper reports on a pilot investigation of ML developers perception of fairness. In describing the perception of fairness, the paper performs an exploratory pilot study to assess the attributes of this construct using a systematic focus group of developers. In the focus group, we asked participants to discuss three questions- 1) What are the characteristics of fairness in ML? 2) What factors influence developers belief about the fairness of ML? and 3) What practices and tools are utilized for fairness in ML development? The findings of this exploratory work from the focus group show that to assess fairness developers generally focus on the overall ML application design and development, i.e., business-specific requirements, data collection, pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing. Thus, we conclude that the procedural aspects of organizational justice theory can explain developers perception of fairness. The findings of this study can be utilized further to assist development teams in integrating fairness in the ML application development lifecycle. It will also motivate ML developers and organizations to develop best practices for assessing the fairness of ML-based applications.