# Revisiting Automated Prompting: Are We Actually Doing Better?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03609 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03609/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15723/) (2020)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07676/) (2020)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [GPT Understands, Too](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10385/) (2021)
- [P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07602/) (2021)
- [It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07118/) (2020)
- [PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01279/) (2022)
- [PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11259/) (2021)
- [How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08493/) (2021)
- [Differentiable Prompt Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13161/) (2021)
- [Exploring the Universal Vulnerability of Prompt-based Learning Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05239/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [D-CIPHER: Dynamic Collaborative Intelligent Multi-Agent System with Planner and Heterogeneous Executors for Offensive Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10931/) (2025)
- [Revisiting OPRO: The Limitations of Small-Scale LLMs as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10276/) (2024)
- [Prompting in the Dark: Assessing Human Performance in Prompt Engineering for Data Labeling When Gold Labels Are Absent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11267/) (2025)
- [A Communication Theory Perspective on Prompting Engineering Methods for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18358/) (2023)
- [MODP: Multi Objective Directional Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18722/) (2025)
- [Prompt-with-Me: in-IDE Structured Prompt Management for LLM-Driven Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17096/) (2025)
- [To Write or to Automate Linguistic Prompts, That Is the Question](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25169/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current literature demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are great few-shot learners, and prompting significantly increases their performance on a range of downstream tasks in a few-shot learning setting. An attempt to automate human-led prompting followed, with some progress achieved. In particular, subsequent work demonstrates automation can outperform fine-tuning in certain K-shot learning scenarios. In this paper, we revisit techniques for automated prompting on six different downstream tasks and a larger range of K-shot learning settings. We find that automated prompting does not consistently outperform simple manual prompts. Our work suggests that, in addition to fine-tuning, manual prompts should be used as a baseline in this line of research.