# Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPT

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02554 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02554/

## Key facts

- Cited by 126 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13848/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14520/) (2023)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.11283/) (2018)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07100/) (2020)
- [Exploring ChatGPT's Ability to Rank Content: A Preliminary Study on Consistency with Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07610/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 126)

- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16739/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examiner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04181/) (2023)
- [Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14556/) (2023)
- [UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14761/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01724/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17012/) (2023)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18486/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02901/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04069/) (2024)
- [FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00908/) (2024)
- [On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14239/) (2023)
- [Fast and Robust Early-Exiting Framework for Autoregressive Language Models with Synchronized Parallel Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05424/) (2023)
- [Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02622/) (2024)
- [LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01383/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13091/) (2023)
- [Jais and Jais-chat: Arabic-Centric Foundation and Instruction-Tuned Open Generative Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16149/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09184/) (2023)
- [CodeTransOcean: A Comprehensive Multilingual Benchmark for Code Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04951/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11289/) (2024)
- [NoteChat: A Dataset of Synthetic Doctor-Patient Conversations Conditioned on Clinical Notes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15959/) (2023)
- [Cheating Automatic LLM Benchmarks: Null Models Achieve High Win Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07137/) (2024)
- [Summarization is (Almost) Dead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09558/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22316/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Character Understanding of Large Language Models via Character Profiling from Fictional Works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12726/) (2024)
- [Language Models Hallucinate, but May Excel at Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14564/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating text summarization is a challenging problem, and existing evaluation metrics are far from satisfactory. In this study, we explored ChatGPT's ability to perform human-like summarization evaluation using four human evaluation methods on five datasets. We found that ChatGPT was able to complete annotations relatively smoothly using Likert scale scoring, pairwise comparison, Pyramid, and binary factuality evaluation. Additionally, it outperformed commonly used automatic evaluation metrics on some datasets. Furthermore, we discussed the impact of different prompts, compared its performance with that of human evaluation, and analyzed the generated explanations and invalid responses.