# Risk-Sensitive and Robust Model-Based Reinforcement Learning and Planning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00573 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00573/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 54 of its 186 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 54)

- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03476/) (2016)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Mastering Atari with Discrete World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02193/) (2020)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10293/) (2018)
- [A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03342/) (2021)
- [Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11361/) (2019)
- [MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13239/) (2020)
- [COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08363/) (2021)
- [Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06923/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01548/) (2021)
- [Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00456/) (2019)
- [Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10592/) (2018)
- [VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08348/) (2019)
- [AlgaeDICE: Policy Gradient from Arbitrary Experience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02074/) (2019)
- [Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09184/) (2019)
- [Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06226/) (2021)
- [Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04895/) (2021)
- [Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08909/) (2021)
- [Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Based Offline Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03647/) (2020)
- [RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12581/) (2022)
- [Adversarially Trained Actor Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02446/) (2022)
- [Reward (Mis)design for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13906/) (2021)
- [Online Robust Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14523/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many sequential decision-making problems that are currently automated, such as those in manufacturing or recommender systems, operate in an environment where there is either little uncertainty, or zero risk of catastrophe. As companies and researchers attempt to deploy autonomous systems in less constrained environments, it is increasingly important that we endow sequential decision-making algorithms with the ability to reason about uncertainty and risk. In this thesis, we will address both planning and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches to sequential decision-making. In the planning setting, it is assumed that a model of the environment is provided, and a policy is optimised within that model. Reinforcement learning relies upon extensive random exploration, and therefore usually requires a simulator in which to perform training. In many real-world domains, it is impossible to construct a perfectly accurate model or simulator. Therefore, the performance of any policy is inevitably uncertain due to the incomplete knowledge about the environment. Furthermore, in stochastic domains, the outcome of any given run is also uncertain due to the inherent randomness of the environment. These two sources of uncertainty are usually classified as epistemic, and aleatoric uncertainty, respectively. The over-arching goal of this thesis is to contribute to developing algorithms that mitigate both sources of uncertainty in sequential decision-making problems. We make a number of contributions towards this goal, with a focus on model-based algorithms...