# Impact of Video Processing Operations in Deepfake Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17247 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17247/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04948/) (2018)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10196/) (2017)
- [Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01412/) (2020)
- [FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08971/) (2019)
- [Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12962/) (2019)
- [Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Clues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09355/) (2020)
- [Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02406/) (2021)
- [Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08376/) (2022)
- [FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05932/) (2019)
- [Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Poses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00661/) (2018)
- [Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08233/) (2019)
- [Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12376/) (2021)
- [On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01717/) (2019)
- [DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03024/) (2020)
- [Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Textures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12356/) (2019)
- [Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01856/) (2021)
- [DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08685/) (2018)
- [Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06693/) (2021)
- [Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09096/) (2021)
- [The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07397/) (2020)
- [Two-Stream Neural Networks for Tampered Face Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11276/) (2018)
- [Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00582/) (2019)
- [Use of a Capsule Network to Detect Fake Images and Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12467/) (2019)
- [On the generalization of GAN image forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.11153/) (2019)
- [Deepfakes Detection with Automatic Face Weighting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12027/) (2020)
- [On Low-Resolution Face Recognition in the Wild: Comparisons and New Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11529/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Fit for Purpose? Deepfake Detection in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16556/) (2025)
- [Conditional Uncertainty-Aware Political Deepfake Detection with Stochastic Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10343/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The detection of digital face manipulation in video has attracted extensive attention due to the increased risk to public trust. To counteract the malicious usage of such techniques, deep learning-based deepfake detection methods have been developed and have shown impressive results. However, the performance of these detectors is often evaluated using benchmarks that hardly reflect real-world situations. For example, the impact of various video processing operations on detection accuracy has not been systematically assessed. To address this gap, this paper first analyzes numerous real-world influencing factors and typical video processing operations. Then, a more systematic assessment methodology is proposed, which allows for a quantitative evaluation of a detector's robustness under the influence of different processing operations. Moreover, substantial experiments have been carried out on three popular deepfake detectors, which give detailed analyses on the impact of each operation and bring insights to foster future research.