# Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11932 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11932/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 78 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6806/) (2014)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09838/) (2020)
- [Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03296/) (2017)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07896/) (2020)
- [What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03703/) (2020)
- [Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09994/) (2020)
- [Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03717/) (2017)
- [Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07857/) (2017)
- [Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01517/) (2022)
- [Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10171/) (2018)
- [Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13584/) (2019)
- [Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.05371/) (2020)
- [Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03751/) (2019)
- [Attention Branch Network: Learning of Attention Mechanism for Visual Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10025/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14499/) (2024)
- [Good Teachers Explain: Explanation-Enhanced Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03119/) (2024)
- [B-cosification: Transforming Deep Neural Networks to be Inherently Interpretable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00715/) (2024)
- [SLIM: Spuriousness Mitigation with Minimal Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05594/) (2024)
- [Neglected Free Lunch -- Learning Image Classifiers Using Annotation Byproducts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17595/) (2023)
- [B-cos LM: Efficiently Transforming Pre-trained Language Models for Improved Explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12992/) (2025)
- [Attention IoU: Examining Biases in CelebA using Attention Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19846/) (2025)
- [AIM: Amending Inherent Interpretability via Self-Supervised Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11502/) (2025)
- [Where Not to Learn: Prior-Aligned Training with Subset-based Attribution Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07008/) (2026)
- [Explanation Regularisation through the Lens of Attributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16693/) (2024)
- [FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25512/) (2025)
- [Model Guidance via Explanations Turns Image Classifiers into Segmentation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03009/) (2024)
- [Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22312/) (2024)
- [Invariance Pair Guidance: Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Corrective Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18975/) (2025)
- [Bridging Fairness and Explainability: Can Input-Based Explanations Promote Fairness in Hate Speech Detection?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22291/) (2025)
- [Hybrid Attribution Priors for Explainable and Robust Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14719/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite being highly performant, deep neural networks might base their decisions on features that spuriously correlate with the provided labels, thus hurting generalization. To mitigate this, 'model guidance' has recently gained popularity, i.e. the idea of regularizing the models' explanations to ensure that they are "right for the right reasons". While various techniques to achieve such model guidance have been proposed, experimental validation of these approaches has thus far been limited to relatively simple and / or synthetic datasets. To better understand the effectiveness of the various design choices that have been explored in the context of model guidance, in this work we conduct an in-depth evaluation across various loss functions, attribution methods, models, and 'guidance depths' on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets. As annotation costs for model guidance can limit its applicability, we also place a particular focus on efficiency. Specifically, we guide the models via bounding box annotations, which are much cheaper to obtain than the commonly used segmentation masks, and evaluate the robustness of model guidance under limited (e.g. with only 1% of annotated images) or overly coarse annotations. Further, we propose using the EPG score as an additional evaluation metric and loss function ('Energy loss'). We show that optimizing for the Energy loss leads to models that exhibit a distinct focus on object-specific features, despite only using bounding box annotations that also include background regions. Lastly, we show that such model guidance can improve generalization under distribution shifts. Code available at: https://github.com/sukrutrao/Model-Guidance.