# PASS: Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection for training with Noisy Labels

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10802 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10802/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 55 of its 105 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 55)

- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.00915/) (2016)
- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02249/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05747/) (2017)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05394/) (2017)
- [DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07394/) (2020)
- [Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09050/) (2018)
- [MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05055/) (2017)
- [Exploring Generalization in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08947/) (2017)
- [Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08199/) (2020)
- [Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06112/) (2019)
- [Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00151/) (2020)
- [Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02752/) (2020)
- [WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.02862/) (2017)
- [Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13554/) (2020)
- [Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12088/) (2021)
- [Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03240/) (2020)
- [Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02613/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04108/) (2020)
- [REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07911/) (2019)
- [Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07805/) (2020)
- [Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02160/) (2019)
- [Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03809/) (2019)
- [Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07756/) (2021)
- [Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08193/) (2018)
- [Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.14026/) (2022)
- [Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02130/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Rethinking Noisy Label Learning in Real-world Annotation Scenarios from the Noise-type Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16889/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalence of noisy-label samples poses a significant challenge in deep learning, inducing overfitting effects. This has, therefore, motivated the emergence of learning with noisy-label (LNL) techniques that focus on separating noisy- and clean-label samples to apply different learning strategies to each group of samples. Current methodologies often rely on the small-loss hypothesis or feature-based selection to separate noisy- and clean-label samples, yet our empirical observations reveal their limitations, especially for labels with instance dependent noise (IDN). An important characteristic of IDN is the difficulty to distinguish the clean-label samples that lie near the decision boundary (i.e., the hard samples) from the noisy-label samples. We, therefore, propose a new noisy-label detection method, termed Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection (PASS), to address this problem. Utilising a trio of classifiers, PASS employs consensus-driven peer-based agreement of two models to select the samples to train the remaining model. PASS is easily integrated into existing LNL models, enabling the improvement of the detection accuracy of noisy- and clean-label samples, which increases the classification accuracy across various LNL benchmarks.