# A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10420 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10420/

## Key facts

- Cited by 246 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05426/) (2017)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06476/) (2023)
- [How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09210/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10724/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Limits of ChatGPT for Query or Aspect-based Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08081/) (2023)
- [Bilateral Multi-Perspective Matching for Natural Language Sentences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03814/) (2017)
- [How Robust is GPT-3.5 to Predecessors? A Comprehensive Study on Language Understanding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00293/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 246)

- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15005/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04939/) (2023)
- [VeriGen: A Large Language Model for Verilog Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00708/) (2023)
- [InstructUIE: Multi-task Instruction Tuning for Unified Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08085/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Recent Advances in LLM-Based Multi-turn Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18013/) (2024)
- [MemOS: A Memory OS for AI System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03724/) (2025)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04339/) (2023)
- [GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08526/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Impact of Instruction Data Scaling on Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Real-World Use Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14742/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04069/) (2024)
- [ToolSword: Unveiling Safety Issues of Large Language Models in Tool Learning Across Three Stages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10753/) (2024)
- [LV-Eval: A Balanced Long-Context Benchmark with 5 Length Levels Up to 256K](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05136/) (2024)
- [If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00812/) (2024)
- [Can ChatGPT replace StackOverflow? A Study on Robustness and Reliability of Large Language Model Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10335/) (2023)
- [UniversalNER: Targeted Distillation from Large Language Models for Open Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03279/) (2023)
- [A Complete Survey on LLM-based AI Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16937/) (2024)
- [Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09656/) (2024)
- [One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06488/) (2023)
- [Generative Pre-trained Transformer: A Comprehensive Review on Enabling Technologies, Potential Applications, Emerging Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10435/) (2023)
- [Towards Interpretable Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03347/) (2023)
- [ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02506/) (2025)
- [Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20320/) (2023)
- [Physical Property Understanding from Language-Embedded Feature Fields](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04242/) (2024)
- [RoTBench: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models in Tool Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08326/) (2024)
- [MARS: Meaning-Aware Response Scoring for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11756/) (2024)
- [ContextAgent: Context-Aware Proactive LLM Agents with Open-World Sensory Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14668/) (2025)
- [Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04400/) (2023)
- [Lightweight Deep Learning for Resource-Constrained Environments: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07236/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

GPT series models, such as GPT-3, CodeX, InstructGPT, ChatGPT, and so on, have gained considerable attention due to their exceptional natural language processing capabilities. However, despite the abundance of research on the difference in capabilities between GPT series models and fine-tuned models, there has been limited attention given to the evolution of GPT series models' capabilities over time. To conduct a comprehensive analysis of the capabilities of GPT series models, we select six representative models, comprising two GPT-3 series models (i.e., davinci and text-davinci-001) and four GPT-3.5 series models (i.e., code-davinci-002, text-davinci-002, text-davinci-003, and gpt-3.5-turbo). We evaluate their performance on nine natural language understanding (NLU) tasks using 21 datasets. In particular, we compare the performance and robustness of different models for each task under zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. Our extensive experiments reveal that the overall ability of GPT series models on NLU tasks does not increase gradually as the models evolve, especially with the introduction of the RLHF training strategy. While this strategy enhances the models' ability to generate human-like responses, it also compromises their ability to solve some tasks. Furthermore, our findings indicate that there is still room for improvement in areas such as model robustness.