# Simple and Efficient Confidence Score for Grading Whole Slide Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04604 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04604/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04712/) (2018)
- [Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01200/) (2018)
- [Understanding Softmax Confidence and Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04972/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty-Informed Deep Learning Models Enable High-Confidence Predictions for Digital Histopathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04516/) (2022)
- [Cost-aware Pre-training for Multiclass Cost-sensitive Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.09337/) (2015)
- [Generalisation effects of predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for digital pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09693/) (2021)
- [Deep Active Learning for Axon-Myelin Segmentation on Histology Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05143/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [How to Fix a Broken Confidence Estimator: Evaluating Post-hoc Methods for Selective Classification with Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15508/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Grading precancerous lesions on whole slide images is a challenging task: the continuous space of morphological phenotypes makes clear-cut decisions between different grades often difficult, leading to low inter- and intra-rater agreements. More and more Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are developed to help pathologists perform and standardize their diagnosis. However, those models can render their prediction without consideration of the ambiguity of the classes and can fail without notice which prevent their wider acceptance in a clinical context. In this paper, we propose a new score to measure the confidence of AI models in grading tasks. Our confidence score is specifically adapted to ordinal output variables, is versatile and does not require extra training or additional inferences nor particular architecture changes. Comparison to other popular techniques such as Monte Carlo Dropout and deep ensembles shows that our method provides state-of-the art results, while being simpler, more versatile and less computationally intensive. The score is also easily interpretable and consistent with real life hesitations of pathologists. We show that the score is capable of accurately identifying mispredicted slides and that accuracy for high confidence decisions is significantly higher than for low-confidence decisions (gap in AUC of 17.1% on the test set). We believe that the proposed confidence score could be leveraged by pathologists directly in their workflow and assist them on difficult tasks such as grading precancerous lesions.