# Comparing PSDNet, pretrained networks, and traditional feature extraction for predicting the particle size distribution of granular materials from photographs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04265 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04265/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07261/) (2016)
- [ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.01083/) (2017)
- [Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07012/) (2017)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.00712/) (2017)
- [Synthetic Data for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11512/) (2019)
- [From BoW to CNN: Two Decades of Texture Representation for Texture Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.10324/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study aims to evaluate PSDNet, a series of convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) trained with photographs to predict the particle size distribution of granular materials. Nine traditional feature extraction methods and 15 pretrained ConvNets were also evaluated and compared. A dataset including 9600 photographs of 15 different granular materials was used. The influence of image size and color band was verified by using six image sizes between 32 and 160 pixels, and both grayscale and color images as PSDNet inputs. In addition to random training, validation, and testing datasets, a material removal method was also used to evaluate the performances of each image analysis method. With this method, each material was successively removed from the training and validation datasets and used as the testing dataset. Results show that a combination of all PSDNet color and grayscale features can lead to a root mean square error (RMSE) on the percentages passing as low as 1.8 % with a random testing dataset and 9.1% with the material removal method. For the random datasets, a combination of all traditional features, and the features extracted from InceptionResNetV2 led to RMSE on the percentages passing of 2.3 and 1.7 %, respectively.