# Improved Differentially Private Regression via Gradient Boosting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03451 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03451/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.08815/) (2022)
- [Private Selection from Private Candidates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07971/) (2018)
- [Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02596/) (2018)
- [Differentially Private Ordinary Least Squares](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.02482/) (2015)
- [Differentially Private Simple Linear Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05157/) (2020)
- [The Role of Adaptive Optimizers for Honest Private Hyperparameter Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04906/) (2021)
- [Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boosting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09680/) (2021)
- [Privacy-Preserving Gradient Boosting Decision Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04209/) (2019)
- [Easy Differentially Private Linear Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07353/) (2022)
- [Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Subsampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11989/) (2023)
- [DP-XGBoost: Private Machine Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12770/) (2021)
- [Revisiting Differentially Private Regression: Lessons From Learning Theory and their Consequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.06388/) (2015)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13531/) (2024)
- [Better Private Linear Regression Through Better Private Feature Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00920/) (2023)
- [Private Regression via Data-Dependent Sufficient Statistic Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15002/) (2024)
- [Near-Optimal Private Linear Regression via Iterative Hessian Mixing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07545/) (2026)
- [The Normal Distributions Indistinguishability Spectrum and its Application to Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01243/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Differentially Private Mechanisms via Empirical Bayes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21107/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit the problem of differentially private squared error linear regression. We observe that existing state-of-the-art methods are sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters -- including the ``clipping threshold'' that cannot be set optimally in a data-independent way. We give a new algorithm for private linear regression based on gradient boosting. We show that our method consistently improves over the previous state of the art when the clipping threshold is taken to be fixed without knowledge of the data, rather than optimized in a non-private way -- and that even when we optimize the hyperparameters of competitor algorithms non-privately, our algorithm is no worse and often better. In addition to a comprehensive set of experiments, we give theoretical insights to explain this behavior.
