# On Extracting Specialized Code Abilities from Large Language Models: A Feasibility Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03012 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03012/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21460/) (2025)
- [Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01432/) (2023)
- [SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Manner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05498/) (2024)
- [Towards Better Chain-of-Thought Prompting Strategies: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04959/) (2023)
- [Large Model Based Agents: State-of-the-Art, Cooperation Paradigms, Security and Privacy, and Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14457/) (2024)
- [LLMs Can Defend Themselves Against Jailbreaking in a Practical Manner: A Vision Paper](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15727/) (2024)
- [Attention is All You Need to Defend Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08417/) (2025)
- ["Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02718/) (2024)
- [How Secure is Secure Code Generation? Adversarial Prompts Put LLM Defenses to the Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07084/) (2026)
- [TREAT: A Code LLMs Trustworthiness / Reliability Evaluation and Testing Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17163/) (2025)
- [AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24857/) (2026)
- [Stealing the Invisible: Unveiling Pre-Trained CNN Models through Adversarial Examples and Timing Side-Channels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11953/) (2024)
- [Simple and Effective Baselines for Code Summarisation Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19392/) (2025)
- [Rethinking and Exploring String-Based Malware Family Classification in the Era of LLMs and RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04055/) (2025)
- [JudgeStealer: Extracting LLM Judging Capabilities across Evaluation Protocols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26982/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) significantly boost their usage in software engineering. However, training a well-performing LLM demands a substantial workforce for data collection and annotation. Moreover, training datasets may be proprietary or partially open, and the process often requires a costly GPU cluster. The intellectual property value of commercial LLMs makes them attractive targets for imitation attacks, but creating an imitation model with comparable parameters still incurs high costs. This motivates us to explore a practical and novel direction: slicing commercial black-box LLMs using medium-sized backbone models. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of launching imitation attacks on LLMs to extract their specialized code abilities, such as"code synthesis" and "code translation." We systematically investigate the effectiveness of launching code ability extraction attacks under different code-related tasks with multiple query schemes, including zero-shot, in-context, and Chain-of-Thought. We also design response checks to refine the outputs, leading to an effective imitation training process. Our results show promising outcomes, demonstrating that with a reasonable number of queries, attackers can train a medium-sized backbone model to replicate specialized code behaviors similar to the target LLMs. We summarize our findings and insights to help researchers better understand the threats posed by imitation attacks, including revealing a practical attack surface for generating adversarial code examples against LLMs.