# Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01248 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01248/

## Key facts

- Cited by 70 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 95 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04359/) (2021)
- [How Can We Know What Language Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12543/) (2019)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01326/) (2019)
- [An Empirical Study of GPT-3 for Few-Shot Knowledge-Based VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05014/) (2021)
- [Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11147/) (2022)
- [Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03035/) (2019)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [Identifying and Manipulating the Personality Traits of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10276/) (2022)
- [Collaborative Storytelling with Large-scale Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10208/) (2020)
- [a survey on GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00857/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 70)

- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18231/) (2024)
- [Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01171/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18486/) (2023)
- [Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16180/) (2023)
- [Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03656/) (2023)
- [Knowing What LLMs DO NOT Know: A Simple Yet Effective Self-Detection Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17918/) (2023)
- [PersonaX: A Recommendation Agent Oriented User Modeling Framework for Long Behavior Sequence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02398/) (2025)
- [Interactive Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13246/) (2023)
- [DialogBench: Evaluating LLMs as Human-like Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01677/) (2023)
- [Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07991/) (2024)
- [AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11839/) (2024)
- [LLM-GLOBE: A Benchmark Evaluating the Cultural Values Embedded in LLM Output](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06032/) (2024)
- [Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07115/) (2024)
- [ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04214/) (2024)
- [The Potential and Challenges of Evaluating Attitudes, Opinions, and Values in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11096/) (2024)
- [IQA-EVAL: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13545/) (2024)
- [User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11518/) (2023)
- [FakeGPT: Fake News Generation, Explanation and Detection of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05046/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on LLM Bias and Toxicity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12566/) (2025)
- [RLPF: Reinforcement Learning from Prediction Feedback for User Summarization with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04421/) (2024)
- [Measuring Human and AI Values Based on Generative Psychometrics with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12106/) (2024)
- [Who's the Mole? Modeling and Detecting Intention-Hiding Malicious Agents in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04724/) (2025)
- [Eliciting Personality Traits in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08341/) (2024)
- [Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable Scientific Analogies after Structure Abduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12660/) (2023)
- [How Far Are LLMs from Believable AI? A Benchmark for Evaluating the Believability of Human Behavior Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17115/) (2023)
- [Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17624/) (2024)
- [Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21422/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) especially ChatGPT have produced impressive results in various areas, but their potential human-like psychology is still largely unexplored. Existing works study the virtual personalities of LLMs but rarely explore the possibility of analyzing human personalities via LLMs. This paper presents a generic evaluation framework for LLMs to assess human personalities based on Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) tests. Specifically, we first devise unbiased prompts by randomly permuting options in MBTI questions and adopt the average testing result to encourage more impartial answer generation. Then, we propose to replace the subject in question statements to enable flexible queries and assessments on different subjects from LLMs. Finally, we re-formulate the question instructions in a manner of correctness evaluation to facilitate LLMs to generate clearer responses. The proposed framework enables LLMs to flexibly assess personalities of different groups of people. We further propose three evaluation metrics to measure the consistency, robustness, and fairness of assessment results from state-of-the-art LLMs including ChatGPT and GPT-4. Our experiments reveal ChatGPT's ability to assess human personalities, and the average results demonstrate that it can achieve more consistent and fairer assessments in spite of lower robustness against prompt biases compared with InstructGPT.