# Experience in Engineering Complex Systems: Active Preference Learning with Multiple Outcomes and Certainty Levels

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14630 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14630/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00941/) (2021)
- [A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.4008/) (2013)
- [Preferential Bayesian Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03651/) (2017)
- [Active Preference Learning using Maximum Regret](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04067/) (2020)
- [Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation with preferences over objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04228/) (2019)
- [Global optimization via inverse distance weighting and radial basis functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06498/) (2019)
- [Active preference learning based on radial basis functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13049/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Black-box optimization refers to the optimization problem whose objective function and/or constraint sets are either unknown, inaccessible, or non-existent. In many applications, especially with the involvement of humans, the only way to access the optimization problem is through performing physical experiments with the available outcomes being the preference of one candidate with respect to one or many others. Accordingly, the algorithm so-called Active Preference Learning has been developed to exploit this specific information in constructing a surrogate function based on standard radial basis functions, and then forming an easy-to-solve acquisition function which repetitively suggests new decision vectors to search for the optimal solution. Based on this idea, our approach aims to extend the algorithm in such a way that can exploit further information effectively, which can be obtained in reality such as: 5-point Likert type scale for the outcomes of the preference query (i.e., the preference can be described in not only "this is better than that" but also "this is much better than that" level), or multiple outcomes for a single preference query with possible additive information on how certain the outcomes are. The validation of the proposed algorithm is done through some standard benchmark functions, showing a promising improvement with respect to the state-of-the-art algorithm.
