# EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08715 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08715/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02595/) (2022)
- [Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.00497/) (2020)
- [Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11895/) (2020)
- [No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02041/) (2021)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05474/) (2021)
- [MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00244/) (2022)
- [Textured Mesh Quality Assessment: Large-Scale Dataset and Deep Learning-based Quality Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02397/) (2022)
- [A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05054/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14085/) (2022)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Human Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09489/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00031/) (2024)
- [3DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07236/) (2024)
- [Perceptual Crack Detection for Rendered 3D Textured Meshes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06143/) (2024)
- [Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for Text-to-3D Assets: Dataset and Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16915/) (2025)
- [Low-Complexity Patch-based No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Metric exploiting Weighted Structure and Texture Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15001/) (2025)
- [Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22902/) (2025)
- [Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23343/) (2025)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06689/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, great numbers of efforts have been put into improving the effectiveness of 3D model quality assessment (3DQA) methods. However, little attention has been paid to the computational costs and inference time, which is also important for practical applications. Unlike 2D media, 3D models are represented by more complicated and irregular digital formats, such as point cloud and mesh. Thus it is normally difficult to perform an efficient module to extract quality-aware features of 3D models. In this paper, we address this problem from the aspect of projection-based 3DQA and develop a no-reference (NR) underlineEfficient and underlineEffective underlineProjection-based underline3D Model underlineQuality underlineAssessment (EEP-3DQA) method. The input projection images of EEP-3DQA are randomly sampled from the six perpendicular viewpoints of the 3D model and are further spatially downsampled by the grid-mini patch sampling strategy. Further, the lightweight Swin-Transformer tiny is utilized as the backbone to extract the quality-aware features. Finally, the proposed EEP-3DQA and EEP-3DQA-t (tiny version) achieve the best performance than the existing state-of-the-art NR-3DQA methods and even outperforms most full-reference (FR) 3DQA methods on the point cloud and mesh quality assessment databases while consuming less inference time than the compared 3DQA methods.