# Sanity checks and improvements for patch visualisation in prototype-based image classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08508 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08508/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6806/) (2014)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07538/) (2018)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.01713/) (2016)
- [Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.01650/) (2020)
- [Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02584/) (2019)
- [Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02046/) (2020)
- [Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07450/) (2016)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [A Large-Scale Car Dataset for Fine-Grained Categorization and Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.08959/) (2015)
- [Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15000/) (2021)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01451/) (2019)
- [Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02902/) (2021)
- [ProtoPShare: Prototype Sharing for Interpretable Image Classification and Similarity Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14340/) (2020)
- [Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09840/) (2019)
- [This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02968/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Co-12 Recipe for Evaluating Interpretable Part-Prototype Image Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14517/) (2023)
- [Multi-Scale Grouped Prototypes for Interpretable Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09497/) (2024)
- [ProtoMask: Segmentation-Guided Prototype Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00683/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we perform an in-depth analysis of the visualisation methods implemented in two popular self-explaining models for visual classification based on prototypes - ProtoPNet and ProtoTree. Using two fine-grained datasets (CUB-200-2011 and Stanford Cars), we first show that such methods do not correctly identify the regions of interest inside of the images, and therefore do not reflect the model behaviour. Secondly, using a deletion metric, we demonstrate quantitatively that saliency methods such as Smoothgrads or PRP provide more faithful image patches. We also propose a new relevance metric based on the segmentation of the object provided in some datasets (e.g. CUB-200-2011) and show that the imprecise patch visualisations generated by ProtoPNet and ProtoTree can create a false sense of bias that can be mitigated by the use of more faithful methods. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for other prototype-based models sharing the same visualisation method.