# Revisiting Hidden Representations in Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08272 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08272/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [How transferable are features in deep neural networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1792/) (2014)
- [Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03368/) (2019)
- [Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03962/) (2018)
- [Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07208/) (2019)
- [Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05759/) (2018)
- [Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.03409/) (2016)
- [Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06353/) (2018)
- [Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10356/) (2021)
- [3D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03829/) (2020)
- [Are Large-scale Datasets Necessary for Self-Supervised Pre-training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10740/) (2021)
- [Pre-training without Natural Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08515/) (2021)
- [A critical analysis of self-supervision, or what we can learn from a single image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.13132/) (2019)
- [Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05642/) (2021)
- [CheXtransfer: Performance and Parameter Efficiency of ImageNet Models for Chest X-Ray Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06871/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Attack Vulnerability of Medical Image Analysis Systems: Unexplored Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06356/) (2020)
- [Model Similarity Mitigates Test Set Overuse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12580/) (2019)
- [Does Pretraining for Summarization Require Knowledge Transfer?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04953/) (2021)
- [SupMAE: Supervised Masked Autoencoders Are Efficient Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14540/) (2022)
- [CNN Filter DB: An Empirical Investigation of Trained Convolutional Filters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15331/) (2022)
- [Neural Networks Trained to Solve Differential Equations Learn General Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00042/) (2018)
- [Domain Shift in Computer Vision models for MRI data analysis: An Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07222/) (2020)
- [Effect of Pre-Training Scale on Intra- and Inter-Domain Full and Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Natural and Medical X-Ray Chest Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00116/) (2021)
- [Building medical image classifiers with very limited data using segmentation networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.05205/) (2018)
- [Does Medical Imaging learn different Convolution Filters?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13799/) (2022)
- [Cats, not CAT scans: a study of dataset similarity in transfer learning for 2D medical image classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05940/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04484/) (2024)
- [Patient-Level, Leakage-Aware Deep Learning for Cross-Center Periapical Radiograph Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14703/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While a key component to the success of deep learning is the availability of massive amounts of training data, medical image datasets are often limited in diversity and size. Transfer learning has the potential to bridge the gap between related yet different domains. For medical applications, however, it remains unclear whether it is more beneficial to pre-train on natural or medical images. We aim to shed light on this problem by comparing initialization on ImageNet and RadImageNet on seven medical classification tasks. Our work includes a replication study, which yields results contrary to previously published findings. In our experiments, ResNet50 models pre-trained on ImageNet tend to outperform those trained on RadImageNet. To gain further insights, we investigate the learned representations using Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) and compare the predictions of the different models. Our results indicate that, contrary to intuition, ImageNet and RadImageNet may converge to distinct intermediate representations, which appear to diverge further during fine-tuning. Despite these distinct representations, the predictions of the models remain similar. Our findings show that the similarity between networks before and after fine-tuning does not correlate with performance gains, suggesting that the advantages of transfer learning might not solely originate from the reuse of features in the early layers of a convolutional neural network.
