# Netizens, Academicians, and Information Professionals' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07136 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07136/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 0 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study aims to understand the perceptions and opinions of academicians towards ChatGPT-3 by collecting and analyzing social media comments, and a survey was conducted with library and information science professionals. The research uses a content analysis method and finds that while ChatGPT-3 can be a valuable tool for research and writing, it is not 100% accurate and should be cross-checked. The study also finds that while some academicians may not accept ChatGPT-3, most are starting to accept it. The study is beneficial for academicians, content developers, and librarians.