# Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Underlying Reasoning Tasks in Multi-hop Question Answering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05963 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05963/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 45 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14062/) (2020)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00277/) (2019)
- [ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04326/) (2020)
- [Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15875/) (2020)
- [Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06481/) (2017)
- [CLUTRR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Inductive Reasoning from Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06177/) (2019)
- [Learning to Retrieve Reasoning Paths over Wikipedia Graph for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10470/) (2019)
- [Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.11770/) (2020)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02916/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09758/) (2020)
- [Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08313/) (2021)
- [Quoref: A Reading Comprehension Dataset with Questions Requiring Coreferential Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05803/) (2019)
- [Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02900/) (2019)
- [Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14602/) (2020)
- [Hierarchical Graph Network for Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03631/) (2019)
- [Cognitive Graph for Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05460/) (2019)
- [Dynamically Fused Graph Network for Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06933/) (2019)
- [Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07132/) (2019)
- [Select, Answer and Explain: Interpretable Multi-hop Reading Comprehension over Multiple Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00484/) (2019)
- [Question Answering by Reasoning Across Documents with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09920/) (2018)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension across Multiple Documents by Reasoning over Heterogeneous Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07374/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [End-to-End Beam Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08973/) (2023)
- [On Synthesizing Data for Context Attribution in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05317/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To explain the predicted answers and evaluate the reasoning abilities of models, several studies have utilized underlying reasoning (UR) tasks in multi-hop question answering (QA) datasets. However, it remains an open question as to how effective UR tasks are for the QA task when training models on both tasks in an end-to-end manner. In this study, we address this question by analyzing the effectiveness of UR tasks (including both sentence-level and entity-level tasks) in three aspects: (1) QA performance, (2) reasoning shortcuts, and (3) robustness. While the previous models have not been explicitly trained on an entity-level reasoning prediction task, we build a multi-task model that performs three tasks together: sentence-level supporting facts prediction, entity-level reasoning prediction, and answer prediction. Experimental results on 2WikiMultiHopQA and HotpotQA-small datasets reveal that (1) UR tasks can improve QA performance. Using four debiased datasets that are newly created, we demonstrate that (2) UR tasks are helpful in preventing reasoning shortcuts in the multi-hop QA task. However, we find that (3) UR tasks do not contribute to improving the robustness of the model on adversarial questions, such as sub-questions and inverted questions. We encourage future studies to investigate the effectiveness of entity-level reasoning in the form of natural language questions (e.g., sub-question forms).