# A novel approach to generate datasets with XAI ground truth to evaluate image models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05624 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05624/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07269/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07538/) (2018)
- [Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02508/) (2019)
- [Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06321/) (2015)
- [On the Robustness of Interpretability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08049/) (2018)
- [Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04592/) (2019)
- [Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10912/) (2021)
- [Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07258/) (2020)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01451/) (2019)
- [Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.13291/) (2022)
- [OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05714/) (2020)
- [Investigating the fidelity of explainable artificial intelligence methods for applications of convolutional neural networks in geoscience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03407/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [A comprehensive study on fidelity metrics for XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10640/) (2024)
- [Assessing Fidelity in XAI post-hoc techniques: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Explanations Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01961/) (2023)
- [How Well Do Feature-Additive Explainers Explain Feature-Additive Predictors?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18496/) (2023)
- [Meta-evaluating stability measures: MAX-Senstivity & AVG-Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10942/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the increased usage of artificial intelligence (AI), it is imperative to understand how these models work internally. These needs have led to the development of a new field called eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI). This field consists of on a set of techniques that allows us to theoretically determine the cause of the AI decisions. One main issue of XAI is how to verify the works on this field, taking into consideration the lack of ground truth (GT). In this study, we propose a new method to generate datasets with GT. We conducted a set of experiments that compared our GT with real model explanations and obtained excellent results confirming that our proposed method is correct.