# Real-Time Visual Feedback to Guide Benchmark Creation: A Human-and-Metric-in-the-Loop Workflow

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04434 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04434/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08746/) (2019)
- [A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.05326/) (2015)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14599/) (2019)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02868/) (2019)
- [Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14337/) (2021)
- [Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12434/) (2019)
- [PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scrambling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01130/) (2019)
- [An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02027/) (2019)
- [Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01042/) (2018)
- [Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03683/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04108/) (2020)
- [Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06264/) (2020)
- [CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05320/) (2022)
- [How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.04926/) (2018)
- [Don't Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00415/) (2022)
- [The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01841/) (2017)
- [Ordinal Common-sense Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.00601/) (2016)
- [Outlier Detection for Improved Data Quality and Diversity in Dialog Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03122/) (2019)
- [In-BoXBART: Get Instructions into Biomedical Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07600/) (2022)
- [Our Evaluation Metric Needs an Update to Encourage Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06898/) (2020)
- [DQI: A Guide to Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03964/) (2020)
- [What Knowledge is Needed to Solve the RTE5 Textual Entailment Challenge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03561/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research has shown that language models exploit `artifacts' in benchmarks to solve tasks, rather than truly learning them, leading to inflated model performance. In pursuit of creating better benchmarks, we propose VAIDA, a novel benchmark creation paradigm for NLP, that focuses on guiding crowdworkers, an under-explored facet of addressing benchmark idiosyncrasies. VAIDA facilitates sample correction by providing realtime visual feedback and recommendations to improve sample quality. Our approach is domain, model, task, and metric agnostic, and constitutes a paradigm shift for robust, validated, and dynamic benchmark creation via human-and-metric-in-the-loop workflows. We evaluate via expert review and a user study with NASA TLX. We find that VAIDA decreases effort, frustration, mental, and temporal demands of crowdworkers and analysts, simultaneously increasing the performance of both user groups with a 45.8% decrease in the level of artifacts in created samples. As a by product of our user study, we observe that created samples are adversarial across models, leading to decreases of 31.3% (BERT), 22.5% (RoBERTa), 14.98% (GPT-3 fewshot) in performance.