# Performative Recommendation: Diversifying Content via Strategic Incentives

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04336 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04336/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Performative Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06673/) (2020)
- [Strategic Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06980/) (2015)
- [Fairness of Exposure in Rankings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07281/) (2018)
- [How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11214/) (2017)
- [Stochastic Optimization of Sorting Networks via Continuous Relaxations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08850/) (2019)
- [Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Risk](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08570/) (2021)
- [Stochastic Optimization for Performative Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06887/) (2020)
- [Performative Prediction in a Stateful World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03885/) (2020)
- [Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07555/) (2019)
- [How to Learn when Data Reacts to Your Model: Performative Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07698/) (2021)
- [Multisided Fairness for Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.00093/) (2017)
- [The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.13286/) (2019)
- [Strategic Classification in the Dark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11592/) (2021)
- [Causal Strategic Linear Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10066/) (2020)
- [Stochastic optimization with decision-dependent distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11173/) (2020)
- [Strategic Classification Made Practical](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01826/) (2021)
- [Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01028/) (2021)
- [Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12705/) (2021)
- [NeuralNDCG: Direct Optimisation of a Ranking Metric via Differentiable Relaxation of Sorting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07831/) (2021)
- [Modeling Content Creator Incentives on Algorithm-Curated Platforms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13102/) (2022)
- [Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned Incentives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04357/) (2022)
- [A Game-Theoretic Approach to Recommendation Systems with Strategic Content Providers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00955/) (2018)
- [Supply-Side Equilibria in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13489/) (2022)
- [Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00104/) (2020)
- [Stateful Strategic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03827/) (2021)
- [Strategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal Relationships From Strategic Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05762/) (2021)
- [Estimating and Penalizing Induced Preference Shifts in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11966/) (2022)
- [User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Markets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01470/) (2020)
- [Recommendations and User Agency: The Reachability of Collaboratively-Filtered Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.10068/) (2019)
- [Strategic Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08240/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12366/) (2024)
- [Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05146/) (2024)
- [Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07479/) (2023)
- [Performative Policy Gradient: Optimality in Performative Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20576/) (2025)
- [Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23443/) (2025)
- [Performative Debias with Fair-exposure Optimization Driven by Strategic Agents in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17475/) (2024)
- [Learning Classifiers That Induce Markets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20012/) (2025)
- [Nonlinear Performative Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01139/) (2025)
- [User-Creator Feature Polarization in Recommender Systems with Dual Influence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14094/) (2024)
- [Towards Performatively Stable Equilibria in Decision-Dependent Games for Arbitrary Data Distribution Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02619/) (2025)
- [Fraud-Proof Revenue Division on Subscription Platforms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04465/) (2025)
- [Socially-Aware Recommender Systems Mitigate Opinion Clusterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02412/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The primary goal in recommendation is to suggest relevant content to users, but optimizing for accuracy often results in recommendations that lack diversity. To remedy this, conventional approaches such as re-ranking improve diversity by presenting more diverse items. Here we argue that to promote inherent and prolonged diversity, the system must encourage its creation. Towards this, we harness the performative nature of recommendation, and show how learning can incentivize strategic content creators to create diverse content. Our approach relies on a novel form of regularization that anticipates strategic changes to content, and penalizes for content homogeneity. We provide analytic and empirical results that demonstrate when and how diversity can be incentivized, and experimentally demonstrate the utility of our approach on synthetic and semi-synthetic data.
