# Assessing the impact of regulations and standards on innovation in the field of AI

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04110 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04110/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03721/) (2021)
- [The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI market](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12645/) (2022)
- [Product Innovation through Internal Startup in Large Software Companies: a Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08973/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [The Challenges of Balancing AI Compliance and Technological Innovations in Critical Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12423/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Regulations and standards in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) are necessary to minimise risks and maximise benefits, yet some argue that they stifle innovation. This paper critically examines the idea that regulation stifles innovation in the field of AI. Current trends in AI regulation, particularly the proposed European AI Act and the standards supporting its implementation, are discussed. Arguments in support of the idea that regulation stifles innovation are analysed and criticised, and an alternative point of view is offered, showing how regulation and standards can foster innovation in the field of AI.