# Controlling for Stereotypes in Multimodal Language Model Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01582 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01582/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social bias and fairness in VLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2023.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Social bias and fairness in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/social-bias-and-fairness-in-vlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02265/) (2019)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06165/) (2020)
- [How Can We Know What Language Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12543/) (2019)
- [A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12327/) (2020)
- [FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04482/) (2021)
- [Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08951/) (2018)
- [ImageBERT: Cross-modal Pre-training with Large-scale Weak-supervised Image-Text Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07966/) (2020)
- [VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07566/) (2021)
- [Behind the Scene: Revealing the Secrets of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07310/) (2020)
- [Vision-and-Language or Vision-for-Language? On Cross-Modal Influence in Multimodal Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04448/) (2021)
- [Seeing past words: Testing the cross-modal capabilities of pretrained V&L models on counting tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12352/) (2020)
- [Effect of Visual Extensions on Natural Language Understanding in Vision-and-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08066/) (2021)
- [Transferring Knowledge from Vision to Language: How to Achieve it and how to Measure it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11321/) (2021)
- [How to Adapt Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models to a Text-only Input?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08982/) (2022)
- [What do Models Learn From Training on More Than Text? Measuring Visual Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07065/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a methodology and design two benchmark sets for measuring to what extent language-and-vision language models use the visual signal in the presence or absence of stereotypes. The first benchmark is designed to test for stereotypical colors of common objects, while the second benchmark considers gender stereotypes. The key idea is to compare predictions when the image conforms to the stereotype to predictions when it does not. Our results show that there is significant variation among multimodal models: the recent Transformer-based FLAVA seems to be more sensitive to the choice of image and less affected by stereotypes than older CNN-based models such as VisualBERT and LXMERT. This effect is more discernible in this type of controlled setting than in traditional evaluations where we do not know whether the model relied on the stereotype or the visual signal.