# Effectiveness of Moving Target Defenses for Adversarial Attacks in ML-based Malware Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00537 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00537/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 116 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [Adversarial examples in the physical world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.02533/) (2016)
- [Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00420/) (2018)
- [Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02697/) (2016)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07528/) (2015)
- [Universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08401/) (2016)
- [Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06131/) (2017)
- [Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04508/) (2015)
- [Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02943/) (2016)
- [Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.02770/) (2016)
- [Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08598/) (2018)
- [Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01155/) (2017)
- [Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04248/) (2017)
- [On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06705/) (2019)
- [Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07277/) (2016)
- [Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03141/) (2017)
- [Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.01991/) (2017)
- [HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02144/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00069/) (2018)
- [Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08846/) (2019)
- [On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.06280/) (2017)
- [Stealing Hyperparameters in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05351/) (2018)
- [TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07838/) (2018)
- [QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14137/) (2020)
- [Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09470/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Attacks Against Automatic Speech Recognition Systems via Psychoacoustic Hiding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.05665/) (2018)
- [DVERGE: Diversifying Vulnerabilities for Enhanced Robust Generation of Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14720/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Several moving target defenses (MTDs) to counter adversarial ML attacks have been proposed in recent years. MTDs claim to increase the difficulty for the attacker in conducting attacks by regularly changing certain elements of the defense, such as cycling through configurations. To examine these claims, we study for the first time the effectiveness of several recent MTDs for adversarial ML attacks applied to the malware detection domain. Under different threat models, we show that transferability and query attack strategies can achieve high levels of evasion against these defenses through existing and novel attack strategies across Android and Windows. We also show that fingerprinting and reconnaissance are possible and demonstrate how attackers may obtain critical defense hyperparameters as well as information about how predictions are produced. Based on our findings, we present key recommendations for future work on the development of effective MTDs for adversarial attacks in ML-based malware detection.