# Importance Weighted Actor-Critic for Optimal Conservative Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12714 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12714/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 59 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2023.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Offline RL algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/offline-rl-algorithms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 59)

- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02900/) (2018)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09359/) (2020)
- [Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11361/) (2019)
- [MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13239/) (2020)
- [MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05951/) (2020)
- [COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08363/) (2021)
- [Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15085/) (2020)
- [Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00360/) (2019)
- [Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00456/) (2019)
- [Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12021/) (2021)
- [Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06926/) (2021)
- [Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05433/) (2019)
- [DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Corrections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04733/) (2019)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08050/) (2021)
- [Keep Doing What Worked: Behavioral Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08396/) (2020)
- [AlgaeDICE: Policy Gradient from Arbitrary Experience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02074/) (2019)
- [Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06226/) (2021)
- [Hybrid RL: Using Both Offline and Online Data Can Make RL Efficient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06718/) (2022)
- [Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01150/) (2019)
- [Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12809/) (2019)
- [Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04652/) (2021)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04634/) (2022)
- [GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09072/) (2020)
- [OptiDICE: Offline Policy Optimization via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10783/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Offline Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for Linear MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12944/) (2023)
- [Offline Minimax Soft-Q-learning Under Realizability and Partial Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02392/) (2023)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning in Large State Spaces: Algorithms and Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04088/) (2025)
- [A Primal-Dual-Critic Algorithm for Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07818/) (2023)
- [Pessimistic Nonlinear Least-Squares Value Iteration for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01380/) (2023)
- [On Representation Complexity of Model-based and Model-free Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01706/) (2023)
- [On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03301/) (2024)
- [Adversarially Trained Weighted Actor-Critic for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00629/) (2024)
- [The Role of Inherent Bellman Error in Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11686/) (2024)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Additional Covering Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12679/) (2023)
- [Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning under Partial Data Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17506/) (2025)
- [Avoiding Death through Fear Intrinsic Conditioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05529/) (2025)
- [Collaborative Weighting with Pessimistic Critic for Mitigating Overestimation in Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26509/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose A-Crab (Actor-Critic Regularized by Average Bellman error), a new practical algorithm for offline reinforcement learning (RL) in complex environments with insufficient data coverage. Our algorithm combines the marginalized importance sampling framework with the actor-critic paradigm, where the critic returns evaluations of the actor (policy) that are pessimistic relative to the offline data and have a small average (importance-weighted) Bellman error. Compared to existing methods, our algorithm simultaneously offers a number of advantages: (1) It achieves the optimal statistical rate of 1/√N -- where N is the size of offline dataset -- in converging to the best policy covered in the offline dataset, even when combined with general function approximators. (2) It relies on a weaker average notion of policy coverage (compared to the ℓ_∞ single-policy concentrability) that exploits the structure of policy visitations. (3) It outperforms the data-collection behavior policy over a wide range of specific hyperparameters. We provide both theoretical analysis and experimental results to validate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm.
