# Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08745 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08745/

## Key facts

- Cited by 176 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11125/) (2020)
- [The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03193/) (2021)
- [Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.04558/) (2016)
- [Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.02201/) (2016)
- [In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02437/) (2022)
- [MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.00388/) (2018)
- [Self-Training Sampling with Monolingual Data Uncertainty for Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00941/) (2021)
- [Tencent's Multilingual Machine Translation System for WMT22 Large-Scale African Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09644/) (2022)
- [Understanding and Mitigating the Uncertainty in Zero-Shot Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10068/) (2022)
- [Tencent AI Lab - Shanghai Jiao Tong University Low-Resource Translation System for the WMT22 Translation Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08742/) (2022)
- [ConsistTL: Modeling Consistency in Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04262/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 176)

- [GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06463/) (2023)
- [Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13712/) (2023)
- [Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05374/) (2023)
- [Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02736/) (2024)
- [NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18018/) (2023)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15425/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05613/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- ["Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09219/) (2023)
- [Okapi: Instruction-tuned Large Language Models in Multiple Languages with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16039/) (2023)
- [Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07004/) (2023)
- [Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04675/) (2023)
- [Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01852/) (2023)
- [Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04244/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18486/) (2023)
- [A Confederacy of Models: a Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Creative Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08433/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01746/) (2023)
- [Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persist](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03245/) (2023)
- [GliDe with a CaPE: A Low-Hassle Method to Accelerate Speculative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02082/) (2024)
- [GPTEval: A Survey on Assessments of ChatGPT and GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12488/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14542/) (2023)
- [Wisdom of the Silicon Crowd: LLM Ensemble Prediction Capabilities Rival Human Crowd Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19379/) (2024)
- [How Far Are We on the Decision-Making of LLMs? Evaluating LLMs' Gaming Ability in Multi-Agent Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11807/) (2024)
- [Evaluating GPT-4 and ChatGPT on Japanese Medical Licensing Examinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18027/) (2023)
- [BigTranslate: Augmenting Large Language Models with Multilingual Translation Capability over 100 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18098/) (2023)
- [CodeTransOcean: A Comprehensive Multilingual Benchmark for Code Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04951/) (2023)
- [Eliciting the Translation Ability of Large Language Models via Multilingual Finetuning with Translation Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15083/) (2023)
- [Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10513/) (2023)
- [Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03656/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This report provides a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT for machine translation, including translation prompt, multilingual translation, and translation robustness. We adopt the prompts advised by ChatGPT to trigger its translation ability and find that the candidate prompts generally work well with minor performance differences. By evaluating on a number of benchmark test sets, we find that ChatGPT performs competitively with commercial translation products (e.g., Google Translate) on high-resource European languages but lags behind significantly on low-resource or distant languages. As for the translation robustness, ChatGPT does not perform as well as the commercial systems on biomedical abstracts or Reddit comments but exhibits good results on spoken language. Further, we explore an interesting strategy named pivot~prompting for distant languages, which asks ChatGPT to translate the source sentence into a high-resource pivot language before into the target language, improving the translation performance noticeably. With the launch of the GPT-4 engine, the translation performance of ChatGPT is significantly boosted, becoming comparable to commercial translation products, even for distant languages. Human analysis on Google Translate and ChatGPT suggests that ChatGPT with GPT-3.5 tends to generate more hallucinations and mis-translation errors while that with GPT-4 makes the least errors. In other words, ChatGPT has already become a good translator. Please refer to our Github project for more details: https://github.com/wxjiao/Is-ChatGPT-A-Good-Translator