# Simple Yet Surprisingly Effective Training Strategies for LSTMs in Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13918 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13918/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.08880/) (2016)
- [Self-supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using 700,000 Person-days of Wearable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02909/) (2022)
- [Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12938/) (2022)
- [Ensembles of Deep LSTM Learners for Activity Recognition using Wearables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09370/) (2017)
- [Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.05333/) (2020)
- [On Attention Models for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07648/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Deep Feature Extraction Network for User Independent Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12163/) (2021)
- [Learning Disentangled Behaviour Patterns for Wearable-based Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07260/) (2022)
- [Towards Reliable, Automated General Movement Assessment for Perinatal Stroke Screening in Infants Using Wearable Accelerometers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.08068/) (2019)
- [Investigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06173/) (2022)
- [Fatigue Assessment using ECG and Actigraphy Sensors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02871/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Explaining, Analyzing, and Probing Representations of Self-Supervised Learning Models for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07304/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is one of the core research areas in mobile and wearable computing. With the application of deep learning (DL) techniques such as CNN, recognizing periodic or static activities (e.g, walking, lying, cycling, etc.) has become a well studied problem. What remains a major challenge though is the sporadic activity recognition (SAR) problem, where activities of interest tend to be non periodic, and occur less frequently when compared with the often large amount of irrelevant background activities. Recent works suggested that sequential DL models (such as LSTMs) have great potential for modeling nonperiodic behaviours, and in this paper we studied some LSTM training strategies for SAR. Specifically, we proposed two simple yet effective LSTM variants, namely delay model and inverse model, for two SAR scenarios (with and without time critical requirement). For time critical SAR, the delay model can effectively exploit predefined delay intervals (within tolerance) in form of contextual information for improved performance. For regular SAR task, the second proposed, inverse model can learn patterns from the time series in an inverse manner, which can be complementary to the forward model (i.e.,LSTM), and combining both can boost the performance. These two LSTM variants are very practical, and they can be deemed as training strategies without alteration of the LSTM fundamentals. We also studied some additional LSTM training strategies, which can further improve the accuracy. We evaluated our models on two SAR and one non-SAR datasets, and the promising results demonstrated the effectiveness of our approaches in HAR applications.
