# A Seven-Layer Model for Standardising AI Fairness Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11207 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.11207/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14749/) (2021)
- [Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00973/) (2020)
- [A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10002/) (2019)
- [No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08536/) (2017)
- [A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00467/) (2021)
- [Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00199/) (2018)
- [Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01701/) (2017)
- [Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06921/) (2017)
- [A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05700/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09245/) (2018)
- [Fairness Score and Process Standardization: Framework for Fairness Certification in Artificial Intelligence Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06952/) (2022)
- [Trustworthy AI in the Age of Pervasive Computing and Big Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05657/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Trustworthy AI Posture (TAIP): A Framework for Continuous AI Assurance of Agentic Systems at Horizontal and Vertical scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03340/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Problem statement: Standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarks is challenging because AI fairness and other ethical requirements depend on multiple factors such as context, use case, type of the AI system, and so on. In this paper, we elaborate that the AI system is prone to biases at every stage of its lifecycle, from inception to its usage, and that all stages require due attention for mitigating AI bias. We need a standardised approach to handle AI fairness at every stage. Gap analysis: While AI fairness is a hot research topic, a holistic strategy for AI fairness is generally missing. Most researchers focus only on a few facets of AI model-building. Peer review shows excessive focus on biases in the datasets, fairness metrics, and algorithmic bias. In the process, other aspects affecting AI fairness get ignored. The solution proposed: We propose a comprehensive approach in the form of a novel seven-layer model, inspired by the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, to standardise AI fairness handling. Despite the differences in the various aspects, most AI systems have similar model-building stages. The proposed model splits the AI system lifecycle into seven abstraction layers, each corresponding to a well-defined AI model-building or usage stage. We also provide checklists for each layer and deliberate on potential sources of bias in each layer and their mitigation methodologies. This work will facilitate layer-wise standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarking parameters.