# Execution-Based Evaluation for Open-Domain Code Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10481 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10481/

## Key facts

- Cited by 91 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00103/) (2017)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11501/) (2022)
- [Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code Contributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.09293/) (2021)
- [CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10397/) (2022)
- [Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08949/) (2018)
- [Language to Logical Form with Neural Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.01280/) (2016)
- [Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers and Focal Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05617/) (2020)
- [Mapping Language to Code in Programmatic Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09588/) (2018)
- [TRANX: A Transition-based Neural Abstract Syntax Parser for Semantic Parsing and Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02720/) (2018)
- [Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Program Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14502/) (2022)
- [Out of the BLEU: how should we assess quality of the Code Generation models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03133/) (2022)
- [Pynguin: Automated Unit Test Generation for Python](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05218/) (2022)
- [JuICe: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Dataset for Open Domain Context-based Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02216/) (2019)
- [MCoNaLa: A Benchmark for Code Generation from Multiple Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08388/) (2022)
- [Execution-based Evaluation for Data Science Code Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09374/) (2022)
- [Training and Evaluating a Jupyter Notebook Data Science Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12901/) (2022)
- [Automated Unit Test Generation for Python](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14049/) (2020)
- [An Empirical Study of C++ Vulnerabilities in Crowd-Sourced Code Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01321/) (2019)
- [Prefix-to-SQL: Text-to-SQL Generation from Incomplete User Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13066/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 91)

- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [StarCoder: may the source be with you!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06161/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00515/) (2024)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09686/) (2025)
- [InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14898/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21460/) (2025)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03859/) (2024)
- [OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07124/) (2023)
- [Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02605/) (2025)
- [Grounding Language Models to Images for Multimodal Inputs and Outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13823/) (2023)
- [CodeBERTScore: Evaluating Code Generation with Pretrained Models of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05527/) (2023)
- [CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14497/) (2024)
- [HumanEval-XL: A Multilingual Code Generation Benchmark for Cross-lingual Natural Language Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16694/) (2024)
- [EffiBench: Benchmarking the Efficiency of Automatically Generated Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02037/) (2024)
- [Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07989/) (2023)
- [What Are Tools Anyway? A Survey from the Language Model Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15452/) (2024)
- [What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06153/) (2024)
- [Multilingual Large Language Model: A Survey of Resources, Taxonomy and Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04925/) (2024)
- [xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03004/) (2023)
- [Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08604/) (2024)
- [SciReplicate-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent-driven Algorithmic Reproduction from Research Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00255/) (2025)
- [BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Correct and Secure Backends?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11844/) (2025)
- [Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Proficiency, Always? EvoEval: Evolving Coding Benchmarks via LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19114/) (2024)
- [MultiKernelBench: A Multi-Platform Benchmark for Kernel Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17773/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To extend the scope of coding queries to more realistic settings, we propose ODEX, the first Open-Domain EXecution-based natural language (NL) to Python code generation dataset. ODEX has 945 NL-Code pairs spanning 79 diverse libraries, along with 1,707 human-written test cases for execution. Our NL-Code pairs are harvested from StackOverflow forums to encourage natural and practical coding queries. Moreover, ODEX supports four natural languages as intents, in English, Spanish, Japanese, and Russian. ODEX unveils intriguing behavioral differences among top-performing code language models (LM). While CODEX achieves better overall results, CODEGEN improves effectively via scaling -- CODEGEN 6.1B performs comparably with CODEX 12B. Both models show substantial gaps between open and closed domains, but CODEGEN gaps tend to decrease with model size while CODEX gaps increase. We release ODEX to facilitate research into open-domain problems for the code generation community.