# Counterfactual Explanations for Support Vector Machine Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07432 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07432/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06514/) (2018)
- [Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06278/) (2020)
- [Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11190/) (2019)
- [On Generating Plausible Counterfactual and Semi-Factual Explanations for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06399/) (2020)
- [Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.08443/) (2017)
- [On the computation of counterfactual explanations -- A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07749/) (2019)
- [Convex optimization for actionable & plausible counterfactual explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07630/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We tackle the problem of computing counterfactual explanations -- minimal changes to the features that flip an undesirable model prediction. We propose a solution to this question for linear Support Vector Machine (SVMs) models. Moreover, we introduce a way to account for weighted actions that allow for more changes in certain features than others. In particular, we show how to find counterfactual explanations with the purpose of increasing model interpretability. These explanations are valid, change only actionable features, are close to the data distribution, sparse, and take into account correlations between features. We cast this as a mixed integer programming optimization problem. Additionally, we introduce two novel scale-invariant cost functions for assessing the quality of counterfactual explanations and use them to evaluate the quality of our approach with a real medical dataset. Finally, we build a support vector machine model to predict whether law students will pass the Bar exam using protected features, and used our algorithms to uncover the inherent biases of the SVM.