# Is Bio-Inspired Learning Better than Backprop? Benchmarking Bio Learning vs. Backprop

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04614 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04614/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Equilibrium Propagation: Bridging the Gap Between Energy-Based Models and Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05179/) (2016)
- [Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.01596/) (2016)
- [Difference Target Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.7525/) (2014)
- [Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04587/) (2018)
- [Predictive Coding Approximates Backprop along Arbitrary Computation Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04182/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning without Weight Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05391/) (2019)
- [Differentiable plasticity: training plastic neural networks with backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.02464/) (2018)
- [A Theoretical Framework for Target Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14331/) (2020)
- [Direct Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12878/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Learning by Competing Hidden Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10181/) (2018)
- [Biologically Motivated Algorithms for Propagating Local Target Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11703/) (2018)
- [Biologically-plausible learning algorithms can scale to large datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03567/) (2018)
- [Direct Feedback Alignment with Sparse Connections for Local Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02083/) (2019)
- [Hebbian Semi-Supervised Learning in a Sample Efficiency Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09002/) (2021)
- [Hebbian learning with gradients: Hebbian convolutional neural networks with modern deep learning frameworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.01729/) (2021)
- [Backprop-Free Reinforcement Learning with Active Neural Generative Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07046/) (2021)
- [Learning in the Machine: the Symmetries of the Deep Learning Channel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.08608/) (2017)
- [Enabling Continual Learning with Differentiable Hebbian Plasticity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16558/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Brain-Inspired Machine Intelligence: A Survey of Neurobiologically-Plausible Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09257/) (2023)
- [Spiking Neural Networks and Bio-Inspired Supervised Deep Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16235/) (2023)
- [Synaptic Plasticity Models and Bio-Inspired Unsupervised Deep Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16236/) (2023)
- [Biologically-inspired Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation for Biomedical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03192/) (2024)
- [Advancing the Biological Plausibility and Efficacy of Hebbian Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17266/) (2025)
- [Unsupervised End-to-End Training with a Self-Defined Target](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12116/) (2024)
- [Memory Networks: Towards Fully Biologically Plausible Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17282/) (2024)
- [Hebbian Learning with Global Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21367/) (2026)
- [Constrained Hebbian Learning Supports Efficient Representational Allocation under Structural Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16027/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Bio-inspired learning has been gaining popularity recently given that Backpropagation (BP) is not considered biologically plausible. Many algorithms have been proposed in the literature which are all more biologically plausible than BP. However, apart from overcoming the biological implausibility of BP, a strong motivation for using Bio-inspired algorithms remains lacking. In this study, we undertake a holistic comparison of BP vs. multiple Bio-inspired algorithms to answer the question of whether Bio-learning offers additional benefits over BP. We test Bio-algorithms under different design choices such as access to only partial training data, resource constraints in terms of the number of training epochs, sparsification of the neural network parameters and addition of noise to input samples. Through these experiments, we notably find two key advantages of Bio-algorithms over BP. Firstly, Bio-algorithms perform much better than BP when the entire training dataset is not supplied. Four of the five Bio-algorithms tested outperform BP by upto 5% accuracy when only 20% of the training dataset is available. Secondly, even when the full dataset is available, Bio-algorithms learn much quicker and converge to a stable accuracy in far lesser training epochs than BP. Hebbian learning, specifically, is able to learn in just 5 epochs compared to around 100 epochs required by BP. These insights present practical reasons for utilising Bio-learning beyond just their biological plausibility and also point towards interesting new directions for future work on Bio-learning.
