# First Go, then Post-Explore: the Benefits of Post-Exploration in Intrinsic Motivation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03251 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03251/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Hindsight Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.01495/) (2017)
- [First return, then explore](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12919/) (2020)
- [Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09464/) (2018)
- [Automatic Goal Generation for Reinforcement Learning Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.06366/) (2017)
- [Skew-Fit: State-Covering Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03698/) (2019)
- [Teacher algorithms for curriculum learning of Deep RL in continuously parameterized environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07224/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Control Through Non-Parametric Discriminative Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11359/) (2018)
- [Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02832/) (2020)
- [Learning with AMIGo: Adversarially Motivated Intrinsic Goals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12122/) (2020)
- [CURIOUS: Intrinsically Motivated Modular Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.06284/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Curiosity-driven Exploration in Sparse-reward Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10825/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Go-Explore achieved breakthrough performance on challenging reinforcement learning (RL) tasks with sparse rewards. The key insight of Go-Explore was that successful exploration requires an agent to first return to an interesting state ('Go'), and only then explore into unknown terrain ('Explore'). We refer to such exploration after a goal is reached as 'post-exploration'. In this paper, we present a clear ablation study of post-exploration in a general intrinsically motivated goal exploration process (IMGEP) framework, that the Go-Explore paper did not show. We study the isolated potential of post-exploration, by turning it on and off within the same algorithm under both tabular and deep RL settings on both discrete navigation and continuous control tasks. Experiments on a range of MiniGrid and Mujoco environments show that post-exploration indeed helps IMGEP agents reach more diverse states and boosts their performance. In short, our work suggests that RL researchers should consider to use post-exploration in IMGEP when possible since it is effective, method-agnostic and easy to implement.