# Moving Beyond Downstream Task Accuracy for Information Retrieval Benchmarking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01340 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01340/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08734/) (2017)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12832/) (2020)
- [Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00808/) (2020)
- [ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01488/) (2021)
- [SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05720/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05540/) (2021)
- [RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07367/) (2021)
- [XOR QA: Cross-lingual Open-Retrieval Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11856/) (2020)
- [Mr. TyDi: A Multi-lingual Benchmark for Dense Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08787/) (2021)
- [MLPerf Training Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01500/) (2019)
- [PLAID: An Efficient Engine for Late Interaction Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09707/) (2022)
- [Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06052/) (2021)
- [ExplainaBoard: An Explainable Leaderboard for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06387/) (2021)
- [Making a MIRACL: Multilingual Information Retrieval Across a Continuum of Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09984/) (2022)
- [Towards Efficient NLP: A Standard Evaluation and A Strong Baseline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07038/) (2021)
- [An Efficiency Study for SPLADE Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03834/) (2022)
- [CITADEL: Conditional Token Interaction via Dynamic Lexical Routing for Efficient and Effective Multi-Vector Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10411/) (2022)
- [Wacky Weights in Learned Sparse Representations and the Revenge of Score-at-a-Time Query Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11540/) (2021)
- [DESSERT: An Efficient Algorithm for Vector Set Search with Vector Set Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15748/) (2022)
- [Traditional IR rivals neural models on the MS MARCO Document Ranking Leaderboard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08020/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [UDAPDR: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via LLM Prompting and Distillation of Rerankers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00807/) (2023)
- [Information Retrieval Meets Large Language Models: A Strategic Report from Chinese IR Community](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09751/) (2023)
- [MIRAGE-Bench: Automatic Multilingual Benchmark Arena for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13716/) (2024)
- [Building Efficient and Effective OpenQA Systems for Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03590/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural information retrieval (IR) systems have progressed rapidly in recent years, in large part due to the release of publicly available benchmarking tasks. Unfortunately, some dimensions of this progress are illusory: the majority of the popular IR benchmarks today focus exclusively on downstream task accuracy and thus conceal the costs incurred by systems that trade away efficiency for quality. Latency, hardware cost, and other efficiency considerations are paramount to the deployment of IR systems in user-facing settings. We propose that IR benchmarks structure their evaluation methodology to include not only metrics of accuracy, but also efficiency considerations such as a query latency and the corresponding cost budget for a reproducible hardware setting. For the popular IR benchmarks MS MARCO and XOR-TyDi, we show how the best choice of IR system varies according to how these efficiency considerations are chosen and weighed. We hope that future benchmarks will adopt these guidelines toward more holistic IR evaluation.