# Autonomation, Not Automation: Activities and Needs of European Fact-checkers as a Basis for Designing Human-Centered AI Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12143 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12143/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 115 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03242/) (2019)
- [Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07769/) (2021)
- [X-FACT: A New Benchmark Dataset for Multilingual Fact Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09248/) (2021)
- [That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06058/) (2020)
- [SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02696/) (2020)
- [Towards Automated Factchecking: Developing an Annotation Schema and Benchmark for Consistent Automated Claim Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08193/) (2018)
- [Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11427/) (2021)
- [Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11722/) (2019)
- [Language Models as Fact Checkers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04102/) (2020)
- [Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03159/) (2020)
- [Claim Matching Beyond English to Scale Global Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00853/) (2021)
- [Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic in Social Media: A Holistic Perspective and a Call to Arms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07996/) (2020)
- [CheckThat! at CLEF 2020: Enabling the Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08546/) (2020)
- [Article Reranking by Memory-Enhanced Key Sentence Matching for Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10322/) (2021)
- [Human and technological infrastructures of fact-checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10894/) (2022)
- [Automated Fact Checking in the News Room](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02037/) (2019)
- [Monant Medical Misinformation Dataset: Mapping Articles to Fact-Checked Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12294/) (2022)
- [CrowdChecked: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04447/) (2022)
- [Investigating Differences in Crowdsourced News Credibility Assessment: Raters, Tasks, and Expert Criteria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.09533/) (2020)
- [CsFEVER and CTKFacts: Acquiring Czech data for fact verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11115/) (2022)
- [Scalable Fact-checking with Human-in-the-Loop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10992/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Multilingual Previously Fact-Checked Claim Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07991/) (2023)
- [Generative Large Language Models in Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02351/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Multilingual Previously Fact-Checked Claim Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02737/) (2025)
- [A Generative-AI-Driven Claim Retrieval System Capable of Detecting and Retrieving Claims from Social Media Platforms in Multiple Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20668/) (2025)
- [Civil Society in the Loop: Feedback-Driven Adaptation of (L)LM-Assisted Classification in an Open-Source Telegram Monitoring Tool](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06734/) (2025)
- [MultiCW: A Large-Scale Balanced Benchmark Dataset for Training Robust Check-Worthiness Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16298/) (2026)
- [Ctrl-F-Resist. Practices, Challenges, and Technical Needs of Civil Society Organizations Monitoring the Far-Right Online](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00808/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To mitigate the negative effects of false information more effectively, the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to assist fact-checkers is needed. Nevertheless, the lack of focus on the needs of these stakeholders results in their limited acceptance and skepticism toward automating the whole fact-checking process. In this study, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with Central European fact-checkers. Their activities and problems were analyzed using iterative content analysis. The most significant problems were validated with a survey of European fact-checkers, in which we collected 24 responses from 20 countries, i.e., 62% of active European signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). Our contributions include an in-depth examination of the variability of fact-checking work in non-English-speaking regions, which still remained largely uncovered. By aligning them with the knowledge from prior studies, we created conceptual models that help to understand the fact-checking processes. In addition, we mapped our findings on the fact-checkers' activities and needs to the relevant tasks for AI research, while providing a discussion on three AI tasks that were not covered by previous similar studies. The new opportunities identified for AI researchers and developers have implications for the focus of AI research in this domain.
