# Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11820 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11820/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06560/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Neural General Circulation Models for Weather and Climate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07222/) (2023)
- [Probabilistic Emulation of a Global Climate Model with Spherical DYffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14798/) (2024)
- [Multi-fidelity climate model parameterization for better generalization and extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10231/) (2023)
- [Physics-Assisted and Topology-Informed Deep Learning for Weather Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04918/) (2025)
- [Prediction Beyond the Medium Range with an Atmosphere-Ocean Model that Combines Physics-based Modeling and Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19518/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Due to computational constraints, running global climate models (GCMs) for many years requires a lower spatial grid resolution (gtrsim50 km) than is optimal for accurately resolving important physical processes. Such processes are approximated in GCMs via subgrid parameterizations, which contribute significantly to the uncertainty in GCM predictions. One approach to improving the accuracy of a coarse-grid global climate model is to add machine-learned state-dependent corrections at each simulation timestep, such that the climate model evolves more like a high-resolution global storm-resolving model (GSRM). We train neural networks to learn the state-dependent temperature, humidity, and radiative flux corrections needed to nudge a 200 km coarse-grid climate model to the evolution of a 3~km fine-grid GSRM. When these corrective ML models are coupled to a year-long coarse-grid climate simulation, the time-mean spatial pattern errors are reduced by 6-25% for land surface temperature and 9-25% for land surface precipitation with respect to a no-ML baseline simulation. The ML-corrected simulations develop other biases in climate and circulation that differ from, but have comparable amplitude to, the baseline simulation.