# Unsupervised Explanation Generation via Correct Instantiations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11160 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11160/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08207/) (2021)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01193/) (2018)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02361/) (2019)
- [Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09712/) (2022)
- [Rationalizing Neural Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04155/) (2016)
- [Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06875/) (2017)
- [Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07355/) (2019)
- [A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00711/) (2020)
- [Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08129/) (2018)
- [Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07898/) (2019)
- [Generating Visual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08507/) (2016)
- [Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12060/) (2021)
- [Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08674/) (2021)
- [Explaining NLP Models via Minimal Contrastive Editing (MiCE)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13985/) (2020)
- [CGMH: Constrained Sentence Generation by Metropolis-Hastings Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10996/) (2018)
- [Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12323/) (2022)
- [Prompting Contrastive Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06823/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [OS-Copilot: Towards Generalist Computer Agents with Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07456/) (2024)
- [Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05976/) (2023)
- [FactGuard: Agentic Video Misinformation Detection via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22963/) (2026)
- [Speak It Out: Solving Symbol-Related Problems with Symbol-to-Language Conversion for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11725/) (2024)
- [GraphThink: Graph-Enhanced LLM Thinking for Long-Horizon Embodied Task Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07905/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While large pre-trained language models (PLM) have shown their great skills at solving discriminative tasks, a significant gap remains when compared with humans for explanation-related tasks. Among them, explaining the reason why a statement is wrong (e.g., against commonsense) is incredibly challenging. The major difficulty is finding the conflict point, where the statement contradicts our real world. This paper proposes Neon, a two-phrase, unsupervised explanation generation framework. Neon first generates corrected instantiations of the statement (phase I), then uses them to prompt large PLMs to find the conflict point and complete the explanation (phase II). We conduct extensive experiments on two standard explanation benchmarks, i.e., ComVE and e-SNLI. According to both automatic and human evaluations, Neon outperforms baselines, even for those with human-annotated instantiations. In addition to explaining a negative prediction, we further demonstrate that Neon remains effective when generalizing to different scenarios.