# Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11109 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11109/

## Key facts

- Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3555/) (2014)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07243/) (2018)
- [MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00278/) (2018)
- [An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05159/) (2018)
- [Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07075/) (2021)
- [What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01070/) (2018)
- [On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10561/) (2019)
- [Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06309/) (2018)
- [Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09451/) (2019)
- [Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08951/) (2018)
- [Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04508/) (2018)
- [Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04207/) (2016)
- [Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00692/) (2018)
- [Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.11714/) (2018)
- [Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.00075/) (2017)
- [Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07231/) (2018)
- [Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.10610/) (2018)
- [Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04047/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10149/) (2023)
- [Self-Debiasing Large Language Models: Zero-Shot Recognition and Reduction of Stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01981/) (2024)
- [Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01349/) (2024)
- [FairSteer: Inference Time Debiasing for LLMs with Dynamic Activation Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14492/) (2025)
- [Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05392/) (2024)
- [NLU on Data Diets: Dynamic Data Subset Selection for NLP Classification Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03208/) (2023)
- [Understanding and Mitigating Gender Bias in LLMs via Interpretable Neuron Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14457/) (2025)
- [Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15527/) (2024)
- [Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey of Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18658/) (2025)
- [Should We Attend More or Less? Modulating Attention for Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13088/) (2023)
- [DRoP: Distributionally Robust Data Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05579/) (2024)
- [Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00463/) (2024)
- [Why Don't Prompt-Based Fairness Metrics Correlate?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05918/) (2024)
- [Swift Cross-Dataset Pruning: Enhancing Fine-Tuning Efficiency in Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02432/) (2025)
- [Efficient Architecture Search via Bi-level Data Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14200/) (2023)
- [Detecting Bias in Large Language Models: Fine-tuned KcBERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10774/) (2024)
- [Social Bias in Multilingual Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20201/) (2025)
- [Implicit Priors Editing in Stable Diffusion via Targeted Token Adjustment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03400/) (2024)
- [Accelerating Deep Learning with Fixed Time Budget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03790/) (2024)
- [When Debiasing Backfires: Counterintuitive Side Effects of Preprocessing-Based Stereotype Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07937/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven predictive solutions predominant in commercial applications tend to suffer from biases and stereotypes, which raises equity concerns. Prediction models may discover, use, or amplify spurious correlations based on gender or other protected personal characteristics, thus discriminating against marginalized groups. Mitigating gender bias has become an important research focus in natural language processing (NLP) and is an area where annotated corpora are available. Data augmentation reduces gender bias by adding counterfactual examples to the training dataset. In this work, we show that some of the examples in the augmented dataset can be not important or even harmful for fairness. We hence propose a general method for pruning both the factual and counterfactual examples to maximize the model's fairness as measured by the demographic parity, equality of opportunity, and equality of odds. The fairness achieved by our method surpasses that of data augmentation on three text classification datasets, using no more than half of the examples in the augmented dataset. Our experiments are conducted using models of varying sizes and pre-training settings.
