# Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08412 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08412/

## Key facts

- Cited by 92 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 40 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08207/) (2021)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07339/) (2022)
- [GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06745/) (2022)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13346/) (2021)
- [Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Right](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08315/) (2021)
- [QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12693/) (2021)
- [Extractive Summarization as Text Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08795/) (2020)
- [MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03242/) (2019)
- [Fast Abstractive Summarization with Reinforce-Selected Sentence Rewriting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11080/) (2018)
- [Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04434/) (2017)
- [Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04302/) (2021)
- [Ranking Sentences for Extractive Summarization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08636/) (2018)
- [Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05478/) (2020)
- [Discourse-Aware Neural Extractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14142/) (2019)
- [Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13322/) (2019)
- [Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12393/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 92)

- [Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07521/) (2023)
- [LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross Examination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13281/) (2023)
- [Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07981/) (2022)
- [Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06908/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02901/) (2024)
- [SAC3: Reliable Hallucination Detection in Black-Box Language Models via Semantic-aware Cross-check Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01740/) (2023)
- [Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06794/) (2023)
- [Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05778/) (2024)
- [InstructGraph: Boosting Large Language Models via Graph-centric Instruction Tuning and Preference Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08785/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11289/) (2024)
- [From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18959/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Superhuman Models with Consistency Checks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09983/) (2023)
- [LAVE: LLM-Powered Agent Assistance and Language Augmentation for Video Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10294/) (2024)
- [Harnessing the Power of Multiple Minds: Lessons Learned from LLM Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00467/) (2024)
- [Chainpoll: A high efficacy method for LLM hallucination detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18344/) (2023)
- [Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06273/) (2023)
- [Securing Large Language Models: Threats, Vulnerabilities and Responsible Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12503/) (2024)
- [Halo: Estimation and Reduction of Hallucinations in Open-Source Weak Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11764/) (2023)
- [Editing Common Sense in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14956/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Zero-Shot Abstractive Summarization in the Era of Large Language Models from the Perspective of Position Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01989/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Persona Consistency for LLMs' Role-Playing using Persona-Aware Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17662/) (2025)
- [I Don't Know: Explicit Modeling of Uncertainty with an [IDK] Token](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06676/) (2024)
- [Probing the Moral Development of Large Language Models through Defining Issues Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13356/) (2023)
- [A Probabilistic Framework for LLM Hallucination Detection via Belief Tree Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06950/) (2024)
- [Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18889/) (2024)
- [The Order Effect: Investigating Prompt Sensitivity to Input Order in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04134/) (2025)
- [Fair Abstractive Summarization of Diverse Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07884/) (2023)
- [Semantic Consistency for Assuring Reliability of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09138/) (2023)
- [METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01667/) (2024)
- [FIZZ: Factual Inconsistency Detection by Zoom-in Summary and Zoom-out Document](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11184/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While large language models (LLMs) have proven to be effective on a large variety of tasks, they are also known to hallucinate information. To measure whether an LLM prefers factually consistent continuations of its input, we propose a new benchmark called FIB(Factual Inconsistency Benchmark) that focuses on the task of summarization. Specifically, our benchmark involves comparing the scores an LLM assigns to a factually consistent versus a factually inconsistent summary for an input news article. For factually consistent summaries, we use human-written reference summaries that we manually verify as factually consistent. To generate summaries that are factually inconsistent, we generate summaries from a suite of summarization models that we have manually annotated as factually inconsistent. A model's factual consistency is then measured according to its accuracy, i.e. the proportion of documents where it assigns a higher score to the factually consistent summary. To validate the usefulness of FIB, we evaluate 23 large language models ranging from 1B to 176B parameters from six different model families including BLOOM and OPT. We find that existing LLMs generally assign a higher score to factually consistent summaries than to factually inconsistent summaries. However, if the factually inconsistent summaries occur verbatim in the document, then LLMs assign a higher score to these factually inconsistent summaries than factually consistent summaries. We validate design choices in our benchmark including the scoring method and source of distractor summaries. Our code and benchmark data can be found at https://github.com/r-three/fib.